Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Double down on abbreviation style. #121

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 31, 2024
Merged

Conversation

stephenh
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

@bdow bdow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Gonna be quite the version bump PRs 😄

Comment on lines 8 to 11
ofv: "visible",
ofh: "hidden",
ofs: "scroll",
ofa: "auto",
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If I'm being a real stickler, then overflow -> of doesn't exactly follow the conventions, right? That'd expect "overFlow" -> of. I'd be okay with ov, oh, os, etc.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep, updated

Comment on lines +6 to +8
tdn: "none",
tdlt: "line-through",
tdu: "underline",
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like these changes as it's closer to the CSS property names.

vaBl: "baseline",
vam: "middle",
vat: "top",
vaBm: "bottom",
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bdow wdyt of this vaBm vs. vaBottom? Usually when we have "two vabs", we spell out vaBottom vs. vaBaseline, but was thinking maybe this would be cute...

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm indifferent, but would lean towards spelling it out. Feels more clear that way.

@stephenh stephenh marked this pull request as ready for review May 31, 2024 18:51
@stephenh stephenh merged commit 6b28580 into main May 31, 2024
2 checks passed
@stephenh stephenh deleted the feat-more-abbreviations branch May 31, 2024 21:47
homebound-team-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 31, 2024
# [1.135.0](v1.134.0...v1.135.0) (2024-05-31)

### Features

* Double down on abbreviation style. ([#121](#121)) ([6b28580](6b28580))
@homebound-team-bot
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.135.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants