Clean up linter scripts and docs #6457
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
timolegros
previously requested changes
Feb 7, 2024
jnaviask
previously approved these changes
Feb 7, 2024
|
@jnaviask @timolegros Woops— |
…alth into 4800.graham.linter-description
jnaviask
approved these changes
Feb 9, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In the course of other work, I discovered that the
lint-allscript alias had been incorrectly documented inPackage-Scripts.md. In the course of correcting the documentation, several other clean-up TODOs concerning linter scripts were addressed.Link to Issue
Links to, but keeps open, #4800.
Description of Changes
lint-alldocumentationlintscript and alias, which is (1) redundant givenlint-branch(2) never used in our CI, and not recommended in our maingLinting.mdentry