-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 75
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: update server type list index to ignore cx11 entry #995
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #995 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 34.24% 69.67% +35.42%
===========================================
Files 64 64
Lines 7974 7974
===========================================
+ Hits 2731 5556 +2825
+ Misses 5202 1718 -3484
- Partials 41 700 +659
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Could we update the test data to use cx11 instead? And fix it again once we removed it? |
df007d0
to
7c768ab
Compare
…nges Do not hardcode the list indices of the two server types we verify. Instead get the list from the API and calculate the expected indices. This makes us more resilient against changes to the list when server types are deprecated/removed.
7c768ab
to
78d6f43
Compare
I updated the PR to instead get the indices of |
Let me know what you think |
Works for me! |
Do not hardcode the list indices of the two server types we verify. Instead get the list from the API and calculate the expected indices.
This makes us more resilient against changes to the list when server types are deprecated/removed.