Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

zlib 0.7 #307

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 11, 2024
Merged

zlib 0.7 #307

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 11, 2024

Conversation

andreasabel
Copy link
Member

  • Bump CI 'haskell.yml' to latest GHC minors and latest actions
  • Haskell-CI: bump to GHC 9.6.4
  • Allow zlib-0.7

Copy link
Member

@Mikolaj Mikolaj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Mikolaj
Copy link
Member

Mikolaj commented Feb 9, 2024

@andreasabel: anything missing? If not, do the honours! :)

@andreasabel
Copy link
Member Author

I now made the hackage revisions to:

  • hackage-security
  • hackage-security-HTTP
  • hackage-repo-tool

2024-02-11T14:05:43Z AndreasAbel hackage-repo-tool-0.1.1.3-r6
2024-02-11T14:03:35Z AndreasAbel hackage-security-HTTP-0.1.1.1-r8
2024-02-11T13:57:22Z AndreasAbel hackage-security-0.6.2.4-r1

Also: Delete x-revision field from hackage-security-HTTP.cabal etc.

These .cabal files contain at this point changes we do not want to
release in a revision.
@andreasabel andreasabel merged commit 3f0535b into master Feb 11, 2024
20 checks passed
@andreasabel andreasabel deleted the zlib-0.7 branch February 11, 2024 14:20
@andreasabel andreasabel added the re: dependencies Concerning bounds of dependencies (Haskell ecosystem) label Feb 11, 2024
@andreasabel andreasabel self-assigned this Feb 11, 2024
@andreasabel andreasabel added this to the 0.6.2.5 milestone Mar 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
re: dependencies Concerning bounds of dependencies (Haskell ecosystem)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants