-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Find an alternative maintainer #79
Comments
Ah, was meaning to talk to you about this after reading your comments on
GitHub.
I think this is a good idea.
Thank you for the time and work you've put in thus far. I will begin
looking for a new maintainer. Anyone on the CLC can step in if they want,
at least hopefully as an interim? I have no interest in maintaining
filepath long-term (or even short term) myself. I am not super worried
since filepath is pretty stable.
Looping in phadej and bgamari since they may have good ideas for
maintainers.
…On Mon, Jul 27, 2020, 9:40 AM Neil Mitchell ***@***.***> wrote:
My interest in maintaining this library is waning. There are a bunch of
minor but interesting discussions to be had (e.g. #73
<#73>) and maintenance work to
change or not-change CI (e.g. #77
<#77>). I don't typically follow
the approach or tooling of the other libraries maintained by the CLC, and
have little interest in starting. All these factors combined make me think
that finding a new maintainer is not a bad idea.
CC @haskell/core-libraries-committee
<https://github.com/orgs/haskell/teams/core-libraries-committee>
—
You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#79>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEOIX2ZVM3BMLFOQF2DPTJDR5WUXLANCNFSM4PI7BSYA>
.
|
- I'd ask `directory` maintainers. These two libraries are closely related.
- I'd avoid people with opinionated ideas on how path library should
look like (e.g. authors of `path`, `hpath`, `paths`, ...), except if CLC
wants filepaths in base to move into some of the packages' direction
- Windows experience is a plus (4 of 13 of open issues is about that)
- Oleg
…On 27.7.2020 19.52, chessai wrote:
Ah, was meaning to talk to you about this after reading your comments
on GitHub.
I think this is a good idea.
Thank you for the time and work you've put in thus far. I will begin
looking for a new maintainer. Anyone on the CLC can step in if they
want, at least hopefully as an interim? I have no interest in
maintaining filepath long-term (or even short term) myself. I am not
super worried since filepath is pretty stable.
Looping in phadej and bgamari since they may have good ideas for
maintainers.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020, 9:40 AM Neil Mitchell ***@***.***
***@***.***>> wrote:
My interest in maintaining this library is waning. There are a
bunch of minor but interesting discussions to be had (e.g. #73
<#73>) and maintenance
work to change or not-change CI (e.g. #77
<#77>). I don't typically
follow the approach or tooling of the other libraries maintained
by the CLC, and have little interest in starting. All these
factors combined make me think that finding a new maintainer is
not a bad idea.
CC @haskell/core-libraries-committee
<https://github.com/orgs/haskell/teams/core-libraries-committee>
—
You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#79>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEOIX2ZVM3BMLFOQF2DPTJDR5WUXLANCNFSM4PI7BSYA>.
|
Thanks Oleg,
Those are great guidelines.
…On Mon, Jul 27, 2020, 11:20 AM Oleg Grenrus ***@***.***> wrote:
- I'd ask `directory` maintainers. These two libraries are closely related.
- I'd avoid people with opinionated ideas on how path library should look
like (e.g. authors of `path`, `hpath`, `paths`, ...), except if CLC wants
filepaths in base to move into some of the packages' direction
- Windows experience is a plus (4 of 13 of open issues is about that)
- Oleg
On 27.7.2020 19.52, chessai wrote:
Ah, was meaning to talk to you about this after reading your comments on
GitHub.
I think this is a good idea.
Thank you for the time and work you've put in thus far. I will begin
looking for a new maintainer. Anyone on the CLC can step in if they want,
at least hopefully as an interim? I have no interest in maintaining
filepath long-term (or even short term) myself. I am not super worried
since filepath is pretty stable.
Looping in phadej and bgamari since they may have good ideas for
maintainers.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020, 9:40 AM Neil Mitchell ***@***.***>
wrote:
> My interest in maintaining this library is waning. There are a bunch of
> minor but interesting discussions to be had (e.g. #73
> <#73>) and maintenance work to
> change or not-change CI (e.g. #77
> <#77>). I don't typically follow
> the approach or tooling of the other libraries maintained by the CLC, and
> have little interest in starting. All these factors combined make me think
> that finding a new maintainer is not a bad idea.
>
> CC @haskell/core-libraries-committee
> <https://github.com/orgs/haskell/teams/core-libraries-committee>
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#79>, or unsubscribe
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEOIX2ZVM3BMLFOQF2DPTJDR5WUXLANCNFSM4PI7BSYA>
> .
>
|
Any updates on this? |
I've reached out to a potential maintainer just a few moments ago. Waiting to hear back. |
Dear CLC members, as we discussed internally, +1 from myself. |
+1 from me!
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
…On Sunday, November 21st, 2021 at 1:31 PM, Bodigrim ***@***.***> wrote:
Dear CLC members, as we [discussed internally](https://groups.google.com/g/haskell-core-libraries/c/Z93zUA_QVw0), filepath still needs a maintainer. ***@***.***(https://github.com/hasufell) has kindly signalled that he could be interested to take on the burden. I suggest we approve him as a new maintainer of filepath, please vote below.
CC ***@***.***(https://github.com/chessai) ***@***.***(https://github.com/cgibbard) ***@***.***(https://github.com/emilypi) ***@***.***(https://github.com/cigsender) ***@***.***(https://github.com/gwils)
---------------------------------------------------------------
+1 from myself.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, [view it on GitHub](#79 (comment)), or [unsubscribe](https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEK2TBY4444VGHRIWPSCGFTUNE3HVANCNFSM4PI7BSYA).
|
+1
…On Sun, Nov 21, 2021, 16:03 Melanie Brown ***@***.***> wrote:
+1 from me!
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Sunday, November 21st, 2021 at 1:31 PM, Bodigrim ***@***.***> wrote:
> Dear CLC members, as we [discussed internally](
https://groups.google.com/g/haskell-core-libraries/c/Z93zUA_QVw0),
filepath still needs a maintainer. ***@***.***(https://github.com/hasufell)
has kindly signalled that he could be interested to take on the burden. I
suggest we approve him as a new maintainer of filepath, please vote below.
> CC ***@***.***(https://github.com/chessai) ***@***.***(
https://github.com/cgibbard) ***@***.***(https://github.com/emilypi)
***@***.***(https://github.com/cigsender) ***@***.***(
https://github.com/gwils)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> +1 from myself.
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, [view it on GitHub](
#79 (comment)), or
[unsubscribe](
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEK2TBY4444VGHRIWPSCGFTUNE3HVANCNFSM4PI7BSYA).
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#79 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEOIX27CAMS4SGS3RBUMCOTUNFUETANCNFSM4PI7BSYA>
.
|
+1 here
…On Sun, Nov 21, 2021, 4:44 PM chessai ***@***.***> wrote:
+1
On Sun, Nov 21, 2021, 16:03 Melanie Brown ***@***.***> wrote:
> +1 from me!
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On Sunday, November 21st, 2021 at 1:31 PM, Bodigrim ***@***.***> wrote:
>
> > Dear CLC members, as we [discussed internally](
> https://groups.google.com/g/haskell-core-libraries/c/Z93zUA_QVw0),
> filepath still needs a maintainer. ***@***.***(
https://github.com/hasufell)
> has kindly signalled that he could be interested to take on the burden. I
> suggest we approve him as a new maintainer of filepath, please vote
below.
> > CC ***@***.***(https://github.com/chessai) ***@***.***(
> https://github.com/cgibbard) ***@***.***(https://github.com/emilypi)
> ***@***.***(https://github.com/cigsender) ***@***.***(
> https://github.com/gwils)
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > +1 from myself.
> >
> > —
> > You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> > Reply to this email directly, [view it on GitHub](
> #79 (comment)),
or
> [unsubscribe](
>
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEK2TBY4444VGHRIWPSCGFTUNE3HVANCNFSM4PI7BSYA
).
>
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#79 (comment)>,
> or unsubscribe
> <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEOIX27CAMS4SGS3RBUMCOTUNFUETANCNFSM4PI7BSYA
>
> .
>
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#79 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACPZRTVGERHBC7YVFNXPNWLUNF76BANCNFSM4PI7BSYA>
.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS
<https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675>
or Android
<https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.
|
+1 |
@hasufell you should now have admin rights on this repo. Or at least an invitation to gain them (GitHub didn't make it clear which was the case). |
I've added maerwald as a maintainer on hackage. |
My interest in maintaining this library is waning. There are a bunch of minor but interesting discussions to be had (e.g. #73) and maintenance work to change or not-change CI (e.g. #77). I don't typically follow the approach or tooling of the other libraries maintained by the CLC, and have little interest in starting. All these factors combined make me think that finding a new maintainer is not a bad idea.
CC @haskell/core-libraries-committee
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: