Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Rust crate logos to v0.14.3 #5795

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2024
Merged

Update Rust crate logos to v0.14.3 #5795

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2024

Conversation

hash-worker[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@hash-worker hash-worker bot commented Dec 4, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
logos (source) workspace.dependencies patch =0.14.2 -> =0.14.3

Release Notes

maciejhirsz/logos (logos)

v0.14.3: - 2024 edition, improved callback, fixes and better docs!

Compare Source

This is a small release, but it contains two important fixes:

  • Fix for big-endian platforms in #​431
  • Support for Rust 2024 edition in #​435

As well as a nice new feature for callback to support returning Result<Skip>!

Moreover, the documentation has received very nice additions.

Many thanks to all the contributors!

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: maciejhirsz/logos@v0.14.2...v0.14.3


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@hash-worker hash-worker bot enabled auto-merge December 4, 2024 01:37
@hash-worker hash-worker bot requested a review from a team December 4, 2024 01:37
@github-actions github-actions bot added the area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) label Dec 4, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 23.07%. Comparing base (6b9055d) to head (cfe6417).
Report is 23 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5795      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   23.12%   23.07%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         561      568       +7     
  Lines       18913    19103     +190     
  Branches     2680     2697      +17     
==========================================
+ Hits         4373     4408      +35     
- Misses      14488    14643     +155     
  Partials       52       52              
Flag Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts 1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api 1.16% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system 46.42% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client 65.18% <ø> (-6.85%) ⬇️
local.hash-backend-utils 8.80% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk 100.00% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils 1.03% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-subgraph 24.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.deer 6.66% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack 72.51% <ø> (ø)
rust.sarif 87.66% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@hash-worker hash-worker bot added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 4, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 4, 2024

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 189 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-31.229 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 190 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 182 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.118 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$17.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 197 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 184 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.679 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$15.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 165 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-13.195 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$17.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 235 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.94 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 176 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.650 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 186 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.439 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255 $$65.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 437 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.102 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0 $$38.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 343 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.65 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$57.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 401 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2 $$44.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 287 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.345 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2 $$47.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 262 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.072 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$52.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 270 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.420 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255 $$108 \mathrm{ms} \pm 584 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.447 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0 $$41.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 208 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.685 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$99.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 661 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.487 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2 $$81.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 331 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.246 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2 $$90.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 423 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.092 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$97.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 701 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.93 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579 $$1.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.04 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.775 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 50 entities $$5.19 \mathrm{s} \pm 828 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}1843 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$26.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 172 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.329 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$19.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 90.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.110 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$56.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 165 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}53.2 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 25 entities $$174 \mathrm{ms} \pm 460 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.235 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$1.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.14 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.002 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$2.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.74 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$1.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.70 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$2.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$13.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 60.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.106 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 50 entities $$4.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-21.299 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$1.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.11 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.579 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$1.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.11 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.229 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$2.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.99 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.798 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 25 entities $$2.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.268 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

Merged via the queue into main with commit 8ba3249 Dec 4, 2024
165 of 166 checks passed
@hash-worker hash-worker bot deleted the deps/rs/logos-0.x branch December 4, 2024 02:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area)
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants