Update npm package check-dependency-version-consistency to v4

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
check-dependency-version-consistency	devDependencies	major	3.0.3 -> 4.1.0

---

Release Notes

bmish/check-dependency-version-consistency (check-dependency-version-consistency)

v4.1.0

Compare Source

🚀 Enhancement

• #​617 Allow --dep-type option to be specified with CSV (@​bmish)

📝 Documentation

• #​616 Tweak readme example and CLI help text (@​bmish)

Committers: 1

• Bryan Mishkin (@​bmish)

v4.0.0

Compare Source

💥 Breaking Change

• #​609 Use object instead of string to represent package in Node API (@​bmish)
• #​608 Consider optionalDependencies by default (@​bmish)
• #​607 Drop support for Node 14 and Node 19 (@​bmish)
• #​495 Drop support for Node 12 and Node 17 (@​ddzz)

📝 Documentation

• #​611 Show choices in help text for --dep-type (@​bmish)

🏠 Internal

• #​610 Update all dependencies (@​bmish)

Committers: 2

• Bryan Mishkin (@​bmish)
• Darius Dzien (@​ddzz)

v3.3.0

Compare Source

🚀 Enhancement

• #​605 Add new option --dep-type (@​bmish)
• #​606 Add optionalDependencies option to --dep-type (@​bmish)
• #​601 Add peerDependencies option to --dep-type (@​bmish)

Committers: 1

• Bryan Mishkin (@​bmish)

v3.2.1

Compare Source

🐛 Bug Fix

• #​597 Fix publishing issue from v3.2.0 (@​bmish)

Committers: 1

• Bryan Mishkin (@​bmish)

v3.2.0

Compare Source

🚀 Enhancement

• #​591 Add Node API (@​bmish)

🏠 Internal

• #​596 Add some additional npm info to package.json (@​bmish)
• #​594 Harden CI (@​bmish)
• #​595 Test on Node 20 (@​bmish)
• #​593 Enable better TypeScript linting (@​bmish)

Committers: 1

• Bryan Mishkin (@​bmish)

v3.1.1

Compare Source

🐛 Bug Fix

• #​590 pnpm workspace root package should not require name (@​bmish)

Committers: 1

• Bryan Mishkin (@​bmish)

v3.1.0

Compare Source

🚀 Enhancement

• #​574 Support pnpm workspaces (@​bmish)

🐛 Bug Fix

• #​586 Add back error messages when unable to detect workspaces (@​bmish)

📝 Documentation

• #​543 Mention competing offering Yarn Constraints in readme (@​bmish)
• #​544 Mention npm workspaces in readme (@​bmish)

🏠 Internal

• #​561 Add Node v19 to CI (@​ddzz)
• #​548 Add CodeQL (@​bmish)

Committers: 2

• Bryan Mishkin (@​bmish)
• Darius Dzien (@​ddzz)

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 23.12%. Comparing base (6aaf3b0) to head (9f3f85a).
Report is 18 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5045   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   23.12%   23.12%           
=======================================
  Files         561      561           
  Lines       18913    18913           
  Branches     2680     2680           
=======================================
  Hits         4373     4373           
  Misses      14488    14488           
  Partials       52       52           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	1.16% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	46.42% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	72.03% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	8.80% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	100.00% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	1.03% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-subgraph	24.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.deer	6.66% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	72.51% <ø> (ø)
rust.sarif	87.66% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 201 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.106 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$16.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 186 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.694 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$16.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 186 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.582 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 165 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$16.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 194 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.86 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 148 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 157 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 227 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 176 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.663 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$69.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 350 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.277 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$40.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 302 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.169 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$59.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 275 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.014 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$44.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 321 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.571 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$50.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 276 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.256 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$54.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 215 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.424 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$108 \mathrm{ms} \pm 557 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.134 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$43.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 182 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.155 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$97.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 321 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.689 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$81.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 637 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.479 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$88.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 395 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.694 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$93.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 460 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.269 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$1.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.50 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.335 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$547 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.46 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-2.142 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$25.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 221 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.442 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$20.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.517 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$49.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.15 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}7.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$71.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 297 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.230 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.21 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.665 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$2.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.461 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$1.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.07 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.504 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$2.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.001 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$13.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 44.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}46.9 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$5.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}24.6 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$1.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.68 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.473 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.25 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.060 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.71 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.422 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$3.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.947 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

[vilkinsons]

Deprecated in favor of #5769

[hash-worker]

Renovate Ignore Notification

Because you closed this PR without merging, Renovate will ignore this update. You will not get PRs for any future 4.x releases. But if you manually upgrade to 4.x then Renovate will re-enable minor and patch updates automatically.

If you accidentally closed this PR, or if you changed your mind: rename this PR to get a fresh replacement PR.