Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build: Bump versions for v0.62.0-SNAPSHOT #3301

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

swirlds-automation
Copy link
Contributor

@swirlds-automation swirlds-automation commented Nov 26, 2024

Bump versions for v0.62.0-SNAPSHOT

Related to issue: #3300

Signed-off-by: Swirlds Automation <[email protected]>
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Nov 26, 2024

@quiet-node quiet-node added the process Build, test and deployment-process related tasks label Nov 26, 2024
@quiet-node quiet-node added this to the 0.61.0 milestone Nov 26, 2024
@quiet-node quiet-node changed the title Bump versions for v0.62.0-SNAPSHOT build: Bump versions for v0.62.0-SNAPSHOT Nov 26, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 77.92%. Comparing base (d7f1bdc) to head (960b6c3).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3301   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   77.92%   77.92%           
=======================================
  Files          66       66           
  Lines        4476     4476           
  Branches     1004     1004           
=======================================
  Hits         3488     3488           
  Misses        615      615           
  Partials      373      373           
Flag Coverage Δ
config-service 98.14% <ø> (ø)
relay 78.67% <ø> (ø)
server 83.28% <ø> (ø)
ws-server 36.66% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Copy link

Test Results

 22 files   -   5  327 suites   - 95   47m 9s ⏱️ - 30m 24s
607 tests  -   5  599 ✅ + 10  4 💤 ±0  4 ❌  - 15 
857 runs   - 230  845 ✅  - 210  8 💤  - 1  4 ❌  - 19 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 960b6c3. ± Comparison against base commit d7f1bdc.

This pull request removes 5 tests.
"before all" hook for "emits an approval event" ‑ RPC Server Acceptance Tests Acceptance tests @erc20 Acceptance Tests HTS token should behave like erc20 transfer from when the token owner is not the zero address when the recipient is not the zero address when the spender has enough allowance "before all" hook for "emits an approval event"
"before all" hook for "reverts" ‑ RPC Server Acceptance Tests Acceptance tests @erc20 Acceptance Tests HTS token should behave like erc20 transfer from when the token owner is not the zero address when the recipient is not the zero address when the spender does not have enough allowance when the token owner has enough balance "before all" hook for "reverts"
"before each" hook for "reverts" ‑ RPC Server Acceptance Tests Acceptance tests @erc20 Acceptance Tests HTS token should behave like erc20 transfer from when the token owner is not the zero address when the recipient is not the zero address when the spender does not have enough allowance "before each" hook for "reverts"
"before each" hook for "should execute "eth_getStorageAt" request to get current state changes" ‑ RPC Server Acceptance Tests Acceptance tests @api-batch-2 RPC Server Acceptance Tests "before each" hook for "should execute "eth_getStorageAt" request to get current state changes"
"before each" hook: reducing balance for "reverts" ‑ RPC Server Acceptance Tests Acceptance tests @erc20 Acceptance Tests ERC20 Contract should behave like erc20 transfer from when the token owner is not the zero address when the recipient is not the zero address when the spender does not have enough allowance when the token owner does not have enough balance "before each" hook: reducing balance for "reverts"

Copy link
Contributor

@acuarica acuarica left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lg

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
process Build, test and deployment-process related tasks
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants