-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
More links
- Loading branch information
Showing
4 changed files
with
90 additions
and
1 deletion.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ | ||
|
||
# Papers | ||
|
||
There are too many papers on the topics to list. Here are some to get you | ||
started with: | ||
|
||
* Another [collection of code review papers](https://github.com/manjunath5496/Code-Review-Papers/blob/main/README.md). | ||
* [Code Review is just reviewing code? A qualitative study with practitioners in industry](https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3474624.3477063) | ||
* [What really matters in Code Review? A study about challenges and opportunities related to code review in industry](https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3493244.3493255) | ||
* [Using nudges to accelerate code reviews at scale](https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3540250.3549104) | ||
* [The impact of human factors on the participation decision of reviewers in modern code review](https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10664-018-9646-1) | ||
* [Understanding the Experience of Code Review: Misalignments, Attention, and Units of Analysis](https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3530019.3530037) | ||
* [Revisiting code ownership and its relationship with software quality in the scope of modern code review](https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2884781.2884852) | ||
* [Open source software peer review practices: a case study of the Apache server](https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1368088.1368162) | ||
* [Does every inspection need a meeting?](https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/167049.167070) | ||
* [Understanding the sources of variation in software inspections](https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/268411.268421) | ||
* [Can we benchmark Code Review studies? A systematic mapping study of methodology, dataset, and metric](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0164121221001060) | ||
* [Replication Package for "The Impact of Human Factors on the Participation Decision of Reviewers in Modern Code Review"](https://github.com/sruangwan/replication-human-factors-code-review) | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters