Reorganized grouping of props to follow RAC #534
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
✅ Deploy Preview for wl-hopper ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
…ind treated as an id
alexasselin008
approved these changes
Nov 28, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Grouping of props in the documentation props table was flaky, in some instances isDisabled was considered an accessibility prop, where in other place it was not. This PR follows RAC ways of grouping props, while making sure than an id? string is considered an accessibility prop and an id? key is considered exposed in the "default" props.