Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade mssql from 6.4.1 to 8.0.0 #65

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

JamieVangeysel
Copy link
Member

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `npm` dependencies of this project.

✨ Snyk has automatically assigned this pull request, set who gets assigned.

As this is a private repository, Snyk-bot does not have access. Therefore, this PR has been created automatically, but appears to have been created by a real user.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • backend/groupclaes_solicitations/package.json
    • backend/groupclaes_solicitations/package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
high severity 758/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Recently disclosed, Has a fix available, CVSS 7.3
Improper Input Validation
SNYK-JS-FOLLOWREDIRECTS-6141137
Yes Proof of Concept

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Commit messages
Package name: mssql The new version differs by 232 commits.
  • 919f998 8.0.0
  • dff3173 Update changelog
  • beea78a Merge pull request #1357 from dhensby/pulls/dependencies
  • c607e41 Update dependencies
  • 19d7f0a Merge pull request #1356 from dhensby/pulls/value-handler
  • 0b60855 Update readme/changelog
  • b56ee39 Add the concept of valueHandlers for processing returned rows from queries with user provided code
  • 09441db Merge pull request #1353 from tediousjs/dependabot/npm_and_yarn/follow-redirects-1.14.7
  • 5d4c014 Bump follow-redirects from 1.14.5 to 1.14.7
  • 4dccd4c Merge pull request #1343 from trevorbye/doc-fixes
  • 7fea917 Feedback from review
  • 25ffdc0 Merge pull request #1344 from dhensby/pulls/bump-tarn
  • 1640003 Update tarn & debug dependencies
  • 2d04cf8 Merge pull request #1342 from dhensby/pulls/rm-connection-string-parser
  • bbc8db6 make ConnectionPool.parseConnectionString static
  • 35a201f rename deepclone to clone
  • d459900 remove connection string parser
  • e96c67a remove dup info, improve clarity, add samples
  • 8c85f77 Merge pull request #1094 from ttemple06/table-rows-clear
  • e986454 Update docs
  • dbb5211 Update changelog
  • 63ab77f add table.rows.clear() method
  • 275e6d7 Merge pull request #1240 from dhensby/pulls/allow-nully-values
  • e397a61 Update changelog

See the full diff

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

👩‍💻 Set who automatically gets assigned

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Improper Input Validation

…es_solicitations/package-lock.json to reduce vulnerabilities

The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-FOLLOWREDIRECTS-6141137
@JamieVangeysel JamieVangeysel self-assigned this Jan 1, 2024
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jan 1, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants