fix: in case the graphql returns empty

Signed-off-by: Gustavo Inacio <[email protected]>
graphprotocol · Aug 29, 2024 · f881922 · f881922
1 parent d80a7d6
commit f881922
Showing 1 changed file with 45 additions and 44 deletions.
diff --git a/packages/indexer-common/src/allocations/query-fees.ts b/packages/indexer-common/src/allocations/query-fees.ts
@@ -597,55 +597,56 @@ export class AllocationReceiptCollector implements ReceiptCollector {
     ravLastNotFinal: ReceiptAggregateVoucher[],
   ): Promise<ReceiptAggregateVoucher[]> {
     const tapSubgraphResponse = await this.findTransactionsForRavs(ravLastNotFinal)
-
-    const redeemedRavsNotOnOurDatabase = tapSubgraphResponse.transactions.filter(
-      (tx) =>
-        !ravLastNotFinal.find(
-          (rav) =>
-            toAddress(rav.senderAddress) === toAddress(tx.sender.id) &&
-            toAddress(rav.allocationId) === toAddress(tx.allocationID),
-        ),
-    )
-
-    // for each transaction that is not redeemed on our database
-    // but was redeemed on the blockchain, update it to redeemed
-    if (redeemedRavsNotOnOurDatabase.length > 0) {
-      for (const rav of redeemedRavsNotOnOurDatabase) {
-        await this.markRavAsRedeemed(
-          toAddress(rav.allocationID),
-          toAddress(rav.sender.id),
-          rav.timestamp,
-        )
-      }
-    }
-
-    // Filter unfinalized RAVS fetched from DB, keeping RAVs that have not yet been redeemed on-chain
-    const nonRedeemedRavs = ravLastNotFinal
-      .filter((rav) => !!rav.redeemedAt)
-      .filter(
-        (rav) =>
-          !tapSubgraphResponse.transactions.find(
-            (tx) =>
+    if (tapSubgraphResponse) {
+      const redeemedRavsNotOnOurDatabase = tapSubgraphResponse.transactions.filter(
+        (tx) =>
+          !ravLastNotFinal.find(
+            (rav) =>
               toAddress(rav.senderAddress) === toAddress(tx.sender.id) &&
               toAddress(rav.allocationId) === toAddress(tx.allocationID),
           ),
       )
 
-    // we use the subgraph timestamp to make decisions
-    // block timestamp minus 1 minute (because of blockchain timestamp uncertainty)
-    const ONE_MINUTE = 60
-    const blockTimestampSecs = tapSubgraphResponse._meta.block.timestamp - ONE_MINUTE
+      // for each transaction that is not redeemed on our database
+      // but was redeemed on the blockchain, update it to redeemed
+      if (redeemedRavsNotOnOurDatabase.length > 0) {
+        for (const rav of redeemedRavsNotOnOurDatabase) {
+          await this.markRavAsRedeemed(
+            toAddress(rav.allocationID),
+            toAddress(rav.sender.id),
+            rav.timestamp,
+          )
+        }
+      }
 
-    // Mark RAVs as unredeemed in DB if the TAP subgraph couldn't find the redeem Tx.
-    // To handle a chain reorg that "unredeemed" the RAVs.
-    // WE use sql directly due to a bug in sequelize update:
-    // https://github.com/sequelize/sequelize/issues/7664 (bug been open for 7 years no fix yet or ever)
-    if (nonRedeemedRavs.length > 0) {
-      await this.revertRavsRedeemed(nonRedeemedRavs, blockTimestampSecs)
-    }
+      // Filter unfinalized RAVS fetched from DB, keeping RAVs that have not yet been redeemed on-chain
+      const nonRedeemedRavs = ravLastNotFinal
+        .filter((rav) => !!rav.redeemedAt)
+        .filter(
+          (rav) =>
+            !tapSubgraphResponse.transactions.find(
+              (tx) =>
+                toAddress(rav.senderAddress) === toAddress(tx.sender.id) &&
+                toAddress(rav.allocationId) === toAddress(tx.allocationID),
+            ),
+        )
 
-    // For all RAVs that passed finality time, we mark it as final
-    await this.markRavsAsFinal(blockTimestampSecs)
+      // we use the subgraph timestamp to make decisions
+      // block timestamp minus 1 minute (because of blockchain timestamp uncertainty)
+      const ONE_MINUTE = 60
+      const blockTimestampSecs = tapSubgraphResponse._meta.block.timestamp - ONE_MINUTE
+
+      // Mark RAVs as unredeemed in DB if the TAP subgraph couldn't find the redeem Tx.
+      // To handle a chain reorg that "unredeemed" the RAVs.
+      // WE use sql directly due to a bug in sequelize update:
+      // https://github.com/sequelize/sequelize/issues/7664 (bug been open for 7 years no fix yet or ever)
+      if (nonRedeemedRavs.length > 0) {
+        await this.revertRavsRedeemed(nonRedeemedRavs, blockTimestampSecs)
+      }
+
+      // For all RAVs that passed finality time, we mark it as final
+      await this.markRavsAsFinal(blockTimestampSecs)
+    }
 
     return await this.models.receiptAggregateVouchers.findAll({
       where: { redeemedAt: null, final: false, last: true },
@@ -654,7 +655,7 @@ export class AllocationReceiptCollector implements ReceiptCollector {
 
   public async findTransactionsForRavs(
     ravs: ReceiptAggregateVoucher[],
-  ): Promise<TapSubgraphResponse> {
+  ): Promise<TapSubgraphResponse | undefined> {
     const response = await this.tapSubgraph!.query<TapSubgraphResponse>(
       gql`
         query transactions(
@@ -690,7 +691,7 @@ export class AllocationReceiptCollector implements ReceiptCollector {
         ),
       },
     )
-    return response.data!
+    return response.data
   }
 
   // for every allocation_id of this list that contains the redeemedAt less than the current