Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pyroscope.java: bump async-profiler binaries #2341

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 7, 2025

Conversation

aleks-p
Copy link
Contributor

@aleks-p aleks-p commented Jan 6, 2025

PR Description

Update the async-profiler binaries used in pyroscope.java to a newer nightly build. There hasn't been an official release of async-profiler since Jan 20, 2024, however numerous bug-fixes and improvements have been made in the last year, including moving to universal binaries.

Also adds darwin support for pyroscope.java, primarily meant for aiding local development and not intended for profiling in production environments.

PR Checklist

  • CHANGELOG.md updated
  • Tests updated

@grafana/pyroscope-team

@aleks-p aleks-p requested review from a team as code owners January 6, 2025 13:38
@aleks-p aleks-p changed the title Pyroscope: Bump async-profiler binaries for pyroscope.java pyroscope.java: bump async-profiler binaries Jan 6, 2025
@korniltsev
Copy link
Contributor

lgtm
\M/ happy for simplifications

@mattdurham
Copy link
Collaborator

Should we document that it should not be profiling production environments?

@aleks-p
Copy link
Contributor Author

aleks-p commented Jan 6, 2025

@mattdurham you are probably referring to my comment in the description, specifically on Darwin support.

We only mention Linux in our component reference docs and I haven't seen any requests for Darwin support so far (java workloads are typically run on Linux). I'd avoid mentioning Darwin support unless we have incoming questions on this.

@aleks-p aleks-p merged commit 11d2d05 into main Jan 7, 2025
18 checks passed
@aleks-p aleks-p deleted the pyroscope/bump-java-async-profiler branch January 7, 2025 13:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants