fix: fix conflicting overwriteCommand type definition #884
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
shadowusr
force-pushed
the
users/shadowusr/INFRADUTY-26708
branch
from
e55a099 to
a76f082
Compare
shadowusr
force-pushed
the
users/shadowusr/INFRADUTY-26708
branch
from
a76f082 to
8623b5e
Compare
shadowusr
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Existing
overwriteCommanddefinition conflicts with wdio's definition due to an incompatibility betweenorigCommandtypes: wdio's definition has return type ofPromise<... | never>, while ours hasPromise<any>. Since never is not assignable to any, it doesn't work. This PR replacesPromise<any>with justany.