-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rank hands without tiebreaker #2
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
||
def <=>(other_hand) | ||
if rank > other_hand.rank || rank < other_hand.rank | ||
rank <=> other_hand.rank |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why not just do this always? It will Do The Right Thing in all cases. I think the if
is unnecessary.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
my big problem is if rank is equal and i need to do tiebreaking in the future
class HandClassifier | ||
def initialize(hand) | ||
@hand = hand | ||
@rank = classify |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is doing a lot of work in an initializer. How about not having @rank
at all and forcing other classes to call .classify
?
@gabebw @jsteiner