Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fgbs blog1 #1524

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Binary file added content/blog/2022-07-FGBS1/hops.jpg
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
20 changes: 20 additions & 0 deletions content/blog/2022-07-FGBS1/index.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
---
title: "Fighting Galactic Bullshit 1"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should rebrand this a little. I'm not so sure about referring to the misconceptions people have as " bullshit". It feels a little aggressive and some people may perceive this as being blamed. I'm worried that we're annoying people for no reason, and it also seems a little desperate and makes it sound like we're struggling, which is far from the truth.

I think it's better to create a positive context when promoting something instead of focusing on negative things. So instead of saying "we're here to correct the BS" maybe we can instead highlight the progress we've made since the start 15 years ago, which is gigantic! We can point out several features that have been added since some people first encountered galaxy, which they may not have had the chance to hear about. That should already go into the introductory text. This would give a solid framework for most of the blog posts to come.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Most misconceptions are due to the fact that people simply do not know (similarly to how we sometimes do not know and make claims like "only synthetic oil is good for your engine"). But this is what bullshit is - normal oil is just fine if you do not have a turbo (or crazy compression).

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bullshit implies (to some degree) that if you believe this, you've not been smart enough to understand. If you don't want to change the direction I'd be in favor of replacing Bullshit with the more boring Misconceptions.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think Bullshit refers to the arguments of people who don't care about true vs. false - just what is in their interest (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_Bullshit). I'm not sure that applies here. I suspect that most people who hold/repeat some of the perceptions being discussed actually think they are true and care about what is true (so hopefully could be convinced otherwise). Misconceptions seems like a serious and academic word to me - maybe best used later in the post. I wonder about something inspired by clickbait practicioners like "N surprising things that Galaxy is good for". On the other hand - bullshit certainly catches the eye... we need some more marketing expertise!

tease: "Dealing with misconceptions one blog post at a time"
authors: "The Galaxy Team"
date: "2022-07-11"
---

![galaxy hops, super smooth](hops.jpg)

Galaxy is a free open platform designed to give researchers across the world unconstrained access to tools and infrastructure necessary for analysis of their data. Galaxy does a lot of things and contains many components, making it difficult to quickly comprehend everything that it can do. It also evolves [rapidly](https://docs.galaxyproject.org/en/master/releases/index.html). As a result, there are a number of misconceptions about what it is and what can (or cannot) be done with it. To spread the ultimate knowledge across the Universe, we are starting the **“Fighting Galactic Bullshit (FGBs)”** series (yes, we were definitely inspired by a certain [effort](https://www.callingbullshit.org/)). This series identifies the most common misconceptions and explains why they are, simply put, BULLSHIT! It will include the following “episodes”:

1. Galaxy is only useful for genome scientists…, **But, all scientists have genomes, right?**
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess that's the point of the blog post to come, but seems very cryptic. Not sure we'll be shooting ourselves in the foot with genome and dbkey plastered all over the interface.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's about only useful for genome scientists. The first blog post will cover this topic and will point to other communities using Galaxy.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, but what are we alluding to with But, all scientists have genomes, right ?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see your confusion. But this refers to "the plant next to me has a genome" :)
If that is too confusing we might need to find a new word here.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion:
What is a genome scientist anyway?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mvdbeek are you saying there are scientists without genomes (even mitochondrial)?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm saying this is cryptic. Is the joke that because everyone has a genome everyone is a genome scientist (your comp-sci employees, all philosophers, and Object Orientation would like a word with you 🤣 ) ? Or is it that it's irrelevant that Galaxy started that way ?

2. Galaxy does not scale to large and complex problems…, **Define large and complex!**
3. Galaxy offers nothing to informaticians who can write their own code…, **Are you sure?**
4. Galaxy is hard to learn and hard to use…, **And bicycles are hard to park!**
5. Galaxy is only useful for teaching, not real science…, **Who are bigger snobs: teachers or scientists?**
6. Galaxy is neither popular with, nor widely used by real scientists…, **It depends on the meaning of the word “is”.**
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
6. Galaxy is neither popular with, nor widely used by real scientists…, **It depends on the meaning of the word “is”.**
6. Galaxy is neither popular with, nor widely used by real scientists…, **It depends on the meaning of the words “popular” and "real".**

Again, not sure what will be in the blog post, but I feel like the meaning of is is not up for debate ?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like this 'clarification'

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you guys do not remember cultural references to bill Clinton trial, do you? 😄

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah! now it rings a bell ;)

7. Galaxy is free, so there cannot be professional support…, **Try contacting an airline!**
8. Galaxy is free, so there cannot be useful documentation…, **Have you ever assembled a wardrobe yourself?**
9. Galaxy cannot be sustainable in the long run, because no commercial organization is managing it…, **Yeah, for the past 15 years.**