Truncate Score Display #300
Conversation
uses lila's score formatting See: https://github.com/lichess-org/lila/blob/e110605c138c1f6fec417ab9317968b32a928a16/ui/ceval/src/util.ts#L8
|
Adding a couple things:
|
Ekatwikz
force-pushed
the
ekatwikz-truncate-score
branch
from
2ae6122 to
532db9e
Compare
src/utils/tests/score.test.ts
Outdated
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test("should format a large cp score correctly", () => { | ||
| expect(formatScore({ type: "cp", value: 12345.67 })).toBe("+99.0"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
a) centipawn values are only integers
b) while the conversion might be useful for lichess it isn't so much for a local gui, Stockfish displays values up to 20000 for centipawns and we have a nice relation between the distance to zero for tablebase position official-stockfish/Stockfish@def2966 it be unfortunate to lose this information.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
a) Good point, I'll change that test to use a sensible value. I'm still learning the engine interface stuff as I go
b) Afaik, the truncated values will only be used on the eval bar, which is too narrow to display arbitrarily sized values without overflowing. The exact value of the eval bar is displayed by a tooltip
There was a problem hiding this comment.
b) ah okay if it is only the evalbar then it is fine, I had the fear that it might be reused for the engine evaluation display
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I just double checked, and there is also some truncation (in my branch, but also upstream) on the summary to the right of the engine component that displays the evaluation of the first variation
The space here is wide enough to use the full value without truncation, I can change it to do that if that's preferred too
to display possible 5 digit cp values without overflowing
precision is more common throughout
| @@ -66,22 +66,31 @@ function ScoreBubble({ | |||
| textAlign: "center", | |||
| padding: "0.15rem", | |||
| borderRadius: theme.radius.sm, | |||
| width: size === "md" ? "4rem" : "3.5rem", | |||
| width: size === "md" ? "5.0rem" : "3.5rem", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Are these changes from 4rem to 5rem really necessary? I think it would be better to change it to minWidth and keep it at 4rem
uses lila's score formatting
See: https://github.com/lichess-org/lila/blob/e110605c138c1f6fec417ab9317968b32a928a16/ui/ceval/src/util.ts#L8