Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UIIN-2613: Single instance export - MARC files sent to central tenant from member tenant #2334

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 7, 2023

Conversation

mariia-aloshyna
Copy link
Contributor

Purpose

When a user with local tenant permissions exports single instance from Instance detail view, and the instance is shared then the file generated by the export is not posted to the data export in local tenant but in the central tenant, making it unavailable to the users who do not have central tenant permissions.

Approach

  • Set member tenant id to headers when triggering quick-export of shared instance from the member tenant

Refs

https://issues.folio.org/browse/UIIN-2613

Screenshots

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 7, 2023

Jest Unit Test Statistics

    1 files  ±0  228 suites  ±0   13m 8s ⏱️ -21s
899 tests ±0  897 ✔️ ±0  2 💤 ±0  0 ±0 
904 runs  ±0  902 ✔️ ±0  2 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit a356949. ± Comparison against base commit 50f2b95.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Nov 7, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@mariia-aloshyna mariia-aloshyna merged commit c4faa0c into master Nov 7, 2023
4 checks passed
@mariia-aloshyna mariia-aloshyna deleted the UIIN-2613 branch November 7, 2023 15:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants