Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Code Search, II] A tree-sitter parser alternative #1160

Draft
wants to merge 22 commits into
base: new-parser-staging
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Ellpeck
Copy link
Member

@Ellpeck Ellpeck commented Nov 19, 2024

No description provided.

@Ellpeck Ellpeck linked an issue Nov 19, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@EagleoutIce
Copy link
Member

EagleoutIce commented Nov 22, 2024

Still open (to be done within this PR or to be outsourced):

  • switch to npm package once available, to avoid wasm and (hopefully init)
    • Still allow the wasm backend (e.g., if we want to develop/explore part of it) with
      a user-supplied .wasm file.
  • For this we maybe want to create a startup configuration (like a feature list that determines what things are done/initialized on startup) (Julian) (Reconsider Startup Configuration #942)
    • Allow for configuration to switch between the tree sitter version and the RShell
  • Verify that docker etc. work (we should incorporate this into the system tests as done by @gigalasr in Basic System Tests for flowR #1164) -> needs RShell etc. to work
  • pass the TreeSitterExecutor object similar to the RShell (Julian)
  • do not use an RShellExecutor when using TreeSitter for Sourcing (Julian)
  • Verify the source tests with tree-sitter too
  • Reflect the backend in the HelloMessage and the other server Requests
  • Document the new backend and the way we can configure it (Flo, later)
  • Also execute benchmarks with tree-sitter and r shell separately

Please add if there are more @Ellpeck

@EagleoutIce EagleoutIce changed the base branch from main to new-parser-staging November 22, 2024 07:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Code Search, II] A tree-sitter parser alternative
2 participants