Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add docker & api route #120

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

add docker & api route #120

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
12 changes: 12 additions & 0 deletions Dockerfile
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
FROM node:19-alpine
ENV PORT 8080

WORKDIR /usr/src/app

RUN addgroup -S appgroup && adduser -S appuser -G appgroup
USER appuser

RUN apk add --no-cache git
COPY . .
EXPOSE 8080
CMD ["npm", "start", "--no-update-notifier"]
Comment on lines +2 to +12
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

alt text

You changed the application to run on port 8080 in the Dockerfile. This change seems important, so it might be smart to change the documentation accordingly. Additionally, the default server port in appConfig.js was changed to 80. Ensure that the documentation reflects the correct ports for running the application.

Example documentation update:

## Running the Application

To start the application, use the following command:

```bash
docker run -p 8080:8080 your-image-name

The application will be accessible at http://localhost:8080.

Configuration

The application runs on port 80 by default unless specified otherwise in the environment variables.

Comment on lines +1 to +12
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

alt text

Consider using a multi-stage build in your Dockerfile to reduce the final image size and improve security. For example, you can create a build stage to install dependencies and a final stage to copy only the necessary files:

FROM node:19-alpine AS build
WORKDIR /usr/src/app
COPY package*.json ./
RUN npm install
COPY . .

FROM node:19-alpine
WORKDIR /usr/src/app
COPY --from=build /usr/src/app .
EXPOSE 8080
CMD ["npm", "start", "--no-update-notifier"]

(Based on guideline 'Dockerfiles should use multi-stage builds')

2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion src/config/appConfig.js
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
class Configuration {

serverPort() {
return process.env.PORT || 8080;
return process.env.PORT || 80;
}
logLevel(){
return process.env.LOG_LEVEL || "info";
Expand Down
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions src/routes/exampleRouter.js
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -9,4 +9,7 @@ const router = express.Router();
router.route("/:id")
.get(grantAccessByPermissionMiddleware([API_PERMISSIONS.PUBLIC_ENDPOINT]), exampleController.getById)

router.route("/get/:id").get(exampleController.getById)

Comment on lines +12 to +13
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

alt text

The route '/get/:id' is missing the grantAccessByPermissionMiddleware, which is essential for proper permission checks. Update the route definition to include this middleware as follows:

+ router.route("/get/:id").get(grantAccessByPermissionMiddleware([API_PERMISSIONS.PUBLIC_ENDPOINT]), exampleController.getById)

(Based on guideline 'Routes should check permissions')


export default router;
Loading