Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

2019 SIGIR Context Attentive Document Ranking and Query Suggestion #10

Open
ZahraTaherikhonakdar opened this issue Jan 21, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
literature-review Summary of the paper related to the work

Comments

@ZahraTaherikhonakdar
Copy link
Member

ZahraTaherikhonakdar commented Jan 21, 2022

Main Problem:
This paper identified users' search context to improve query suggestion and document ranking. To identify the search context, they consider users' previous queries and document clicks (users feedback) in the search log. To do this, they consider previous queries related to a search task in the search log and consider it as a search session. For example, looking for a job in computer science is a search task, this paper considers all user's queries in the search log related to a computer science job. Previous works that consider search log in QE usually define search session as a timestamp that user is looking for information.
They proposed a model named CARS- Context Attentive document Ranking and query Suggestion.

Input-Output:

phase1:
Input: a user's query + the user's past search behavior like previous queries and clicks
Out-put: the CARS encode the inputs to represent them as a search context.

Phase2:
Input: search context representation
Output: documents ranking+query suggestion

Previous Works and their Gaps:
They identified three solutions in understanding search context:
1- Data-driven solutions which use users' past queries or clicked documents to predict future documents ranking.
2- Model-driven solutions which develop predictive models to predict user's search behavior.
3- Neural network models to understand search context by distributed representation of queries.

In none of the above solutions, researchers considered a user's query and sequence of clicks in the ongoing search session to understand the search context and improve both documents ranking and query suggestion.

Result:
They used evaluation methods like MAP, MRR, NDCG to compare their model with other document ranking models. As the below figure shows the CARS model improved the ranking task based on the evaluation methods.
image

They also compared the model in terms of query suggestion and the performance enhance significantly
image

Data Set:
They used the AOL data set.

Gap of this work:
To identified users' search context this research considered users' previous clicks and queries in the search log instead of considering queries and clicks in one session in a specific timestamp which is a good point. To improve the query suggestion and document ranking performance we could use users' social information in addition to users' previous clicks and queries in the search log. Also considering query type in QE would be a good point.

Code:
https://github.com/wasiahmad/context_attentive_ir

@ZahraTaherikhonakdar ZahraTaherikhonakdar added the literature-review Summary of the paper related to the work label Jan 21, 2022
@ZahraTaherikhonakdar ZahraTaherikhonakdar self-assigned this Jan 21, 2022
@hosseinfani
Copy link
Member

@ZahraTaherikhonakdar
Same comment. The summary is vague. It shows that you have no clear understanding of the work.
Also, the code is available in the first author's github

@ZahraTaherikhonakdar
Copy link
Member Author

@ZahraTaherikhonakdar Same comment. The summary is vague. It shows that you have no clear understanding of the work. Also, the code is available in the first author's github

Done

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
literature-review Summary of the paper related to the work
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants