Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More cleanup of validity language for proofs and formatting #260

Conversation

pipermerriam
Copy link
Member

More tweaks and adjustments to state nework spec.

@pipermerriam pipermerriam marked this pull request as ready for review January 13, 2024 19:42
state-network.md Outdated

###### B: No Extraneous Nodes

A witness MAY NOT contain any nodes that are not part of the set needed to for proving.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From the context within this PR I'd say that the MAY NOT should be rather a SHOULD NOT or MUST NOT?

state-network.md Outdated

##### C: No Redundant Nodes

A witness MAY NOT contain any nodes that can be computed from other nodes in
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

idem above comment.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

switching both to MUST NOT

@pipermerriam pipermerriam merged commit 8b4b902 into ethereum:new-statenetwork-boogie Jan 13, 2024
2 checks passed
@pipermerriam pipermerriam deleted the piper/more-tweaks-to-state-network-spec branch January 13, 2024 23:18
pipermerriam added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2024
* delete removed sections

* remove old data types

* Allow Offer and Request data types to differ

* define nibble types

* Add Function definitions

* Define `Account Trie Node` data type

* Define `Contract Trie Node` data type

* Add section to define `Contract Code` data type

* commit todos

* WIP: STATE SPECS V2

* some disperate changes

* some language updates

* Add language describing the path aware content-id scheme (#250)

* Remove path-aware content-id generation (#252)

* Add definition of recursive gossip (#254)

* initial definition of recursive gossip

* Update state-network.md

Co-authored-by: Kim De Mey <[email protected]>

* Update state-network.md

Co-authored-by: Kim De Mey <[email protected]>

* Update state-network.md

Co-authored-by: Kim De Mey <[email protected]>

* Update state-network.md

Co-authored-by: Kim De Mey <[email protected]>

* Update state-network.md

Co-authored-by: Kim De Mey <[email protected]>

* Update state-network.md

Co-authored-by: Kim De Mey <[email protected]>

---------

Co-authored-by: Kim De Mey <[email protected]>

* Better define serialization formats (#255)

* Better define serialization formats

* more updates to witness formats

* Additional validity requirements and spec fixes for state witnesses (#257)

* Additional validity requirements and spec fixes for state witnesses

* add TODO

* More cleanup of validity language for proofs and formatting (#260)

* More cleanup of validity language for proofs and formatting

* use MUST NOT instead of MAY NOT

* more language and formatting tweaks for state network specification (#261)

* More specificity around bridge node gossip priority ordering for content (#263)

* offer/retrieval union content types splitted into separate types/subsections (#262)

* language clarification for the use of different data types

* remove content_id definition from types + lang fix for content_id

* clarify nibbles packing (align it with MPT) and provide examples (#266)

* update the gossip spec and clarify what proof actually contains (#267)

* update the gossip spec and clarify what proof actually contains

* clarify that recursive gossip doesn't happen for bytecode

---------

Co-authored-by: Piper Merriam <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Kim De Mey <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Sobol <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Milos Stankovic <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants