Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add opcm upgrades spec #468
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add opcm upgrades spec #468
Changes from 6 commits
00ce042
d503636
9558d46
115c61e
0644021
2d41c3d
b911eb4
34e18e4
bb7ea4e
e1e004f
3cf1a9a
90826bf
4317849
8ff5f88
60ecdec
178e253
6de833d
61762db
e1c8541
f3262e1
7703c51
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is the definition?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added the following content below:
By way of example, if an upgrade is adding a new variable
address foo
to theSystemConfig
contract, foran upgrade named
Example
, the struct could have the following definition:We could create a structure in this document wherein each upgrade is expected to document the specific struct required, but I think this is sufficient instruction for an implementer, and I'm hesitant to add that overhead to each upgrade.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
e1c8541
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You should define the game types and the definitions per game type. This spec is not clear enough to enable a second implementation or a reviewer to know that an impl is correct
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Having just learned that the Proofs contracts refactor has been deprioritized, I will need to rewrite this section. Will let you know when that's done.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This commit should address your comment:
7703c51