Typo Update content-reuse.md

[voronor]

Description of the Change:

This PR fixes a typo in the heading for the "How to Use a Single Reusable Content Components" section. The word "Components" has been corrected to "Component" to match the section's focus on a single content component.

Importance of the Change:

• The original heading was grammatically incorrect, as the section discusses how to use one reusable content component.
• This change ensures consistency and clarity, making the documentation easier to understand.
• Using the singular form of "Component" aligns the heading with the actual content and improves the overall professionalism of the documentation.

Summary:

• Fixed typo in the section title.
• Corrected the plural form to singular to reflect the content accurately.

This minor correction helps maintain clarity and consistency across the documentation.

---

This structure highlights the typo fix and explains why it's important for clarity and consistency in the documentation.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	02a34f5
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-optimism/deploys/673619f8d0431500087902a1
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-1115--docs-optimism.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request involves modifications to the document notes/content-reuse.md, specifically correcting the section header for grammatical accuracy. The header "How to Use a Single Reusable Content Components" has been changed to "How to Use a Single Reusable Content Component." The overall structure and content of the document remain unchanged, preserving the instructions for writing and utilizing reusable content components.

Changes

File	Change Summary
notes/content-reuse.md	Updated section header from "How to Use a Single Reusable Content Components" to "How to Use a Single Reusable Content Component."

Possibly related PRs

• Docs improvements #776: This PR also involves a modification to the section header in notes/content-reuse.md, correcting the phrasing for clarity.
• Fix docs #797: This PR includes changes to notes/content-reuse.md, specifically addressing minor textual modifications for clarity, similar to the changes made in the main PR.
• Update docs files with errors #1100: This PR focuses on grammatical corrections in various documentation files, including notes/content-reuse.md, enhancing clarity and consistency, which aligns with the objectives of the main PR.

Suggested reviewers

• cpengilly

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 827e3d4 and 02a34f5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• notes/content-reuse.md (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

notes/content-reuse.md (1)

13-13: LGTM! The grammatical correction improves clarity.

The change from "Components" to "Component" properly reflects that the section discusses using a single reusable content component, making the heading grammatically consistent with its content.

Let's verify the consistency of singular/plural usage throughout the document:

✅ Verification successful

Singular/plural usage of "component" is consistent throughout the documentation

The verification shows that the singular/plural usage is grammatically correct and contextually appropriate across all files:

• "Single Reusable Content Component" correctly uses singular form for a section about using one component
• "Multiple Reusable Content Components" appropriately uses plural for multiple components
• Other instances maintain proper usage:
  • Singular when referring to a specific component (e.g., "WipCallout component")
  • Plural when discussing multiple components (e.g., "React components", "Card components")

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential inconsistencies in singular/plural usage of "component"
# Expected: The word "component" should be singular when referring to single usage
# and plural when referring to multiple usage

echo "Analyzing singular/plural consistency..."
rg -i "component" --type md

Length of output: 2098

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.