Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create op-supervisor.mdx #1044

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Oct 31, 2024
Merged

Create op-supervisor.mdx #1044

merged 9 commits into from
Oct 31, 2024

Conversation

cpengilly
Copy link
Collaborator

@cpengilly cpengilly commented Oct 29, 2024

  • new page under op-stack > interop > op-supervisor

Fixes - https://github.com/ethereum-optimism/devrel/issues/252

Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 29, 2024

Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit a3767d5
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-optimism/deploys/6723b7924e9f9a0008803a00
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1044--docs-optimism.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

pages/stack/interop/op-supervisor.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/stack/interop/op-supervisor.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/stack/interop/op-supervisor.mdx Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/stack/interop/op-supervisor.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/stack/interop/op-supervisor.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@cpengilly cpengilly marked this pull request as ready for review October 30, 2024 18:09
@cpengilly cpengilly requested a review from a team as a code owner October 30, 2024 18:09
pages/stack/interop/op-supervisor.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/stack/interop/op-supervisor.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/stack/interop/op-supervisor.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/stack/interop/op-supervisor.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/stack/interop/op-supervisor.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 30, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@cpengilly has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 8 minutes and 30 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 337f95e and a3767d5.

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve the addition of a new key-value pair in the JSON metadata file and the creation of a new documentation file. Specifically, the key "op-supervisor" with the value "OP Supervisor" is added to pages/stack/interop/_meta.json, while op-supervisor.mdx provides comprehensive documentation on the OP Supervisor's functionality, including its role in cross-chain message verification and interoperability management within the OP Stack.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
pages/stack/interop/_meta.json Added key "op-supervisor": "OP Supervisor"; added a comma to the existing entry for "superchain-erc20".
pages/stack/interop/op-supervisor.mdx Created new documentation file detailing the OP Supervisor's purpose, functionality, and API methods.
words.txt Standardized identifier casing; added entries: ACCOUNTSLOTS, BLOCKLOGS, SEPOLIA, sepolia, zora; removed lowercase zora.

Possibly related PRs

  • Create chain-monitoring.mdx #764: The addition of a key-value pair in a JSON file related to metadata is similar to the main PR's addition of a key in _meta.json, indicating a pattern of updating metadata structures.
  • Smart contract overview update #808: This PR also involves modifications to _meta.json, specifically adding a new entry, which aligns with the main PR's focus on updating metadata.
  • adding op-conductor documentation #818: Similar to the main PR, this PR introduces a new key-value pair in a JSON file, indicating a consistent approach to enhancing metadata across different files.
  • interop explainers #825: The addition of new entries related to interoperability in _meta.json parallels the main PR's focus on adding new keys, suggesting a broader context of enhancing interoperability documentation.
  • op-deployer + opcm documentation #934: This PR updates the _meta.json file to include new entries, which is directly related to the main PR's changes in a similar file structure.
  • superchainERC20 #986: The introduction of the SuperchainERC20 standard in the documentation aligns with the main PR's focus on enhancing interoperability features, indicating a shared goal of improving documentation clarity.
  • Add linked to SuperchainERC20 #1010: The addition of a link to the SuperchainERC20 documentation in the interoperability explainer connects to the main PR's focus on interoperability, reinforcing the relationship between the two.
  • Op deployer updates #1020: The updates to the op-deployer documentation reflect a similar effort to clarify and enhance the usability of tools related to the OP Stack, akin to the main PR's focus on improving documentation.
  • adding address details for opcm #1028: The addition of contract addresses in the OPCM documentation aligns with the main PR's focus on enhancing documentation clarity and usability.
  • adding block time research #1034: The addition of block time research enhances the documentation related to performance metrics, which could relate to the main PR's focus on improving interoperability features.
  • Update op-challenger.mdx #1036: The updates to the op-challenger documentation reflect a similar effort to improve clarity and usability, akin to the main PR's focus on enhancing documentation.
  • tutorials: make geth before using geth init #1042: The tutorial updates regarding the op-geth binary build process align with the main PR's focus on improving user guidance in documentation.

Suggested labels

documentation

Suggested reviewers

  • sbvegan
  • bradleycamacho

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
pages/stack/interop/op-supervisor.mdx (1)

1-5: Enhance the frontmatter description

The description should be more specific and maintain consistent product naming:

-description: Learn the basics of OP-Supervisor.
+description: Learn how OP Supervisor enables secure cross-chain message verification and interoperability in the OP Stack.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8131990 and e3c0a06.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • pages/stack/interop/_meta.json (1 hunks)
  • pages/stack/interop/op-supervisor.mdx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/stack/interop/op-supervisor.mdx (1)

Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
🪛 LanguageTool
pages/stack/interop/op-supervisor.mdx

[uncategorized] ~27-~27: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...ating individual nodes⁠.⁠ * op-geth: queries op-supervisor during block-bu...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~28-~28: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...wn states are encountered. * op-node: queries cross-chain safety information ...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)

🔇 Additional comments (5)
pages/stack/interop/_meta.json (1)

5-6: LGTM! The metadata entry follows the established conventions.

The addition maintains proper JSON structure and follows the existing naming patterns with kebab-case keys and title-case display names.

pages/stack/interop/op-supervisor.mdx (4)

9-13: LGTM!

The title and callout effectively communicate the development status.


15-22: LGTM!

The introduction and features list effectively communicate the purpose and benefits of OP Supervisor.


34-42: LGTM!

The section effectively explains the two types of cross-chain dependencies and their purposes.


60-73: LGTM!

The RPC access section and next steps provide clear guidance and valuable resources.

pages/stack/interop/op-supervisor.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/stack/interop/op-supervisor.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@axelKingsley axelKingsley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

content seems to represent the Supervisor accurately, thanks :). Like your callout mentions, details could shift over time, so I think the doc hits a nice level of abstraction.

pages/stack/interop/op-supervisor.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/stack/interop/op-supervisor.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/stack/interop/op-supervisor.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/stack/interop/op-supervisor.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Blessing Krofegha <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e3c0a06 and 337f95e.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • pages/stack/interop/op-supervisor.mdx (1 hunks)
  • words.txt (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/stack/interop/op-supervisor.mdx (1)

Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
🪛 LanguageTool
pages/stack/interop/op-supervisor.mdx

[uncategorized] ~27-~27: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...ating individual nodes⁠.⁠ * op-geth: queries op-supervisor during block-bu...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~28-~28: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...wn states are encountered. * op-node: queries cross-chain safety information ...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)

words.txt

[duplication] ~2-~2: Möglicher Tippfehler: ein Wort wird wiederholt
Context: ACCOUNTQUEUE accountqueue ACCOUNTSLOTS accountslots ADDI ADDIU ADDU airgap Allnodes Allocs ...

(GERMAN_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)

🔇 Additional comments (7)
words.txt (4)

409-409: Verify the removal of lowercase 'zora'.

The AI summary indicates that lowercase zora was removed while uppercase Zora was retained. This aligns with the common practice of capitalizing proper nouns and protocol names.


33-34: Standardize the casing for technical terms.

The entries BLOCKLOGS and blocklogs represent the same term. Consider standardizing the casing based on how this term is used in the codebase and documentation.

Let's check how these terms are used in the codebase:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage of blocklogs in different cases
rg -i "blocklogs" --type md --type ts --type js
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[duplication] ~34-~34: Möglicher Tippfehler: ein Wort wird wiederholt
Context: ...lockhash blocklists BLOCKLOGS blocklogs BLOCKPROFILERATE blockprofilerate Blockscout blockspace blocktime BLOOMFI...

(GERMAN_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)


329-331: Review the necessity of multiple case variations for network names.

The entries SEPOLIA, Sepolia, and sepolia all refer to the same test network. Consider:

  1. Whether all three variations are necessary
  2. If they align with official Ethereum documentation standards
  3. The specific use cases requiring different cases

Let's check the usage in documentation:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for Sepolia usage in documentation
rg -i "sepolia" --type md

1-2: Consider removing duplicate entries with different cases.

The entries ACCOUNTQUEUE and accountqueue appear to be duplicates. Having the same term in different cases might cause confusion in documentation search and references. Consider maintaining a single consistent case based on the term's usage context.

Let's check for other similar duplicates in the file:

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[duplication] ~1-~1: Möglicher Tippfehler: ein Wort wird wiederholt
Context: ACCOUNTQUEUE accountqueue ACCOUNTSLOTS accountslots ADDI ADDIU AD...

(GERMAN_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)


[duplication] ~2-~2: Möglicher Tippfehler: ein Wort wird wiederholt
Context: ACCOUNTQUEUE accountqueue ACCOUNTSLOTS accountslots ADDI ADDIU ADDU airgap Allnodes Allocs ...

(GERMAN_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)

pages/stack/interop/op-supervisor.mdx (3)

9-13: LGTM!

The title follows sentence case guidelines, and the callout appropriately warns users about the development status.


15-22: LGTM!

The introduction clearly explains the purpose and features of OP Supervisor, maintaining proper technical accuracy.


62-68: LGTM!

The RPC access section clearly explains the requirements and benefits.

pages/stack/interop/op-supervisor.mdx Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/stack/interop/op-supervisor.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/stack/interop/op-supervisor.mdx Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/stack/interop/op-supervisor.mdx Show resolved Hide resolved
@cpengilly cpengilly merged commit fb62da3 into main Oct 31, 2024
7 of 8 checks passed
@cpengilly cpengilly deleted the op-supervisor branch October 31, 2024 17:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants