Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cleanups and esp-hal references #145

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 8, 2024
Merged

Cleanups and esp-hal references #145

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 8, 2024

Conversation

MabezDev
Copy link
Member

This was mostly chip agnostic already, which made this really easy! I did read through the content again though and found some outdated stuff so I addressed that here too.

Closes esp-rs/esp-hal#1218

Copy link
Member

@jessebraham jessebraham left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

I guess we should wait to merge this until the esp-hal release is out (since we use continuous deployment for the book).

Copy link
Member

@SergioGasquez SergioGasquez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks for taking care of this

@MabezDev MabezDev merged commit fa06b86 into main Mar 8, 2024
2 checks passed
@MabezDev MabezDev deleted the esp-hal-upgrade branch March 8, 2024 15:21
mildsunrise added a commit to mildsunrise/book-1 that referenced this pull request Mar 29, 2024
esp-rs#145 updated the code snippet to remove a bunch of code that is no longer needed, but did not remove the bullet point from the explanation, making it confusing to read. it says "The next block ..." but there is no such block.
MabezDev pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2024
#145 updated the code snippet to remove a bunch of code that is no longer needed, but did not remove the bullet point from the explanation, making it confusing to read. it says "The next block ..." but there is no such block.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Book updates
3 participants