Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(Everest) Use one experiment per optimization #8670

Merged

Conversation

yngve-sk
Copy link
Contributor

@yngve-sk yngve-sk commented Sep 10, 2024

@yngve-sk yngve-sk force-pushed the everest-one-experiment-per-enopt-run branch 3 times, most recently from 56ae36b to d7e0fff Compare September 10, 2024 08:26
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 10, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.36%. Comparing base (321767c) to head (53dca44).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8670      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.36%   91.36%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         342      342              
  Lines       20995    20994       -1     
==========================================
- Hits        19183    19182       -1     
  Misses       1812     1812              
Flag Coverage Δ
cli-tests 39.61% <0.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
gui-tests 73.50% <0.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
performance-tests 50.08% <0.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
unit-tests 79.84% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@yngve-sk yngve-sk force-pushed the everest-one-experiment-per-enopt-run branch from d7e0fff to 048db32 Compare September 11, 2024 07:56
Copy link
Contributor

@verveerpj verveerpj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Small comment.

@@ -91,6 +92,7 @@ def callback(*args, **kwargs):
self.control_keys = set(controls.keys())
self.result_keys = set(results)
self.callback = callback
self._experiment_id: Optional[UUID] = None
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

_experiment_id does not seem to be used?

@yngve-sk yngve-sk force-pushed the everest-one-experiment-per-enopt-run branch 2 times, most recently from 904aa5b to fa268e0 Compare September 27, 2024 11:51
@yngve-sk yngve-sk force-pushed the everest-one-experiment-per-enopt-run branch from fac1eae to 53dca44 Compare September 27, 2024 12:41
@yngve-sk yngve-sk merged commit d6862e5 into equinor:main Sep 30, 2024
50 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Revisit mapping from Everest optimization to ERT experiments
3 participants