Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update module github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-framework-validators to v0.15.0 #800

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Oct 17, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-framework-validators v0.13.0 -> v0.15.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

hashicorp/terraform-plugin-framework-validators (github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-framework-validators)

v0.15.0

Compare Source

FEATURES:

  • ephemeralvalidator: Introduce new package with declarative validators for ephemeral resource configurations (#​242)

v0.14.0

Compare Source

NOTES:

  • all: This Go module has been updated to Go 1.22 per the Go support policy. It is recommended to review the Go 1.22 release notes before upgrading. Any consumers building on earlier Go versions may experience errors. (#​229)
  • all: Previously, creating validators with invalid data would result in a nil value being returned and a panic from terraform-plugin-framework. This has been updated to return an implementation diagnostic referencing the invalid data/validator during config validation. (#​235)

FEATURES:

  • boolvalidator: Added Equals validator (#​232)

ENHANCEMENTS:

  • all: Implemented parameter interfaces for all value-based validators. This allows these validators to be used with provider-defined functions. (#​235)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner October 17, 2024 21:20
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/github.com-hashicorp-terraform-plugin-framework-validators-0.x branch from 51ca64a to e8fe73f Compare October 31, 2024 19:28
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update module github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-framework-validators to v0.14.0 fix(deps): update module github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-framework-validators to v0.15.0 Oct 31, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/github.com-hashicorp-terraform-plugin-framework-validators-0.x branch from e8fe73f to 58c76a1 Compare November 4, 2024 18:21
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/github.com-hashicorp-terraform-plugin-framework-validators-0.x branch from 58c76a1 to 0f80b69 Compare November 7, 2024 15:05
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/github.com-hashicorp-terraform-plugin-framework-validators-0.x branch from 0f80b69 to 7ef348a Compare November 7, 2024 15:16
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/github.com-hashicorp-terraform-plugin-framework-validators-0.x branch from 7ef348a to 9dc8203 Compare November 7, 2024 15:31
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/github.com-hashicorp-terraform-plugin-framework-validators-0.x branch from 9dc8203 to 9b2cdbc Compare November 7, 2024 19:12
@ctreatma ctreatma merged commit d834021 into main Nov 7, 2024
11 of 14 checks passed
@ctreatma ctreatma deleted the renovate/github.com-hashicorp-terraform-plugin-framework-validators-0.x branch November 7, 2024 19:32
Copy link

This PR is included in version 2.11.0 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant