Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade terraform-provider-equinix to v1.36.3 #91

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 10, 2024

Conversation

ocobles
Copy link
Contributor

@ocobles ocobles commented May 9, 2024

This PR was generated via $ upgrade-provider equinix/pulumi-equinix --upstream-provider-name terraform-provider-equinix.


  • Upgrading terraform-provider-equinix from 1.34.0 to 1.36.3.
  • Upgrading pulumi-terraform-bridge from v3.79.0 to v3.81.0.
  • Upgrading pulumi-terraform-bridge/pf from v0.32.0 to v0.34.0.

@ocobles ocobles self-assigned this May 9, 2024
@ocobles ocobles requested a review from a team May 9, 2024 17:27
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 9, 2024

Does the PR have any schema changes?

Does the PR have any schema changes?

Found 3 breaking changes:

Types

  • 🟢 "equinix:fabric/getConnectionASideAccessPoint:getConnectionASideAccessPoint": required: "providerConnectionId" property has changed to Required
  • 🟢 "equinix:fabric/getConnectionZSideAccessPoint:getConnectionZSideAccessPoint": required: "providerConnectionId" property has changed to Required
  • 🟢 "equinix:fabric/getServiceProfilesDatum:getServiceProfilesDatum": required: "viewPoint" property has changed to Required
    No new resources/functions.

Maintainer note: consult the runbook for dealing with any breaking changes.

@cprivitere cprivitere merged commit 31df703 into main May 10, 2024
15 checks passed
@cprivitere cprivitere deleted the upgrade-terraform-provider-equinix-to-v1.36.3 branch May 10, 2024 15:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants