Circularity kit update 24.08 adoption view fixed

[LuisRickert]

Description

Added

• add new figures
• add license files for new figures

Changed

• change strucutre of the contents. Same content chapters are in different order
• change wording

Issue 703
REPLACES PR 925

Pre-review checks

Please ensure to do as many of the following checks as possible, before asking for committer review:

• DEPENDENCIES are up-to-date. Dash license tool. Committers can open IP issues for restricted libs.
• Copyright and license header are present on all affected files

[stephanbcbauer]

@LuisRickert thanks for the PR. Can you please check the DEPENDENCIES file? It seems to be outdated. Since this is a PR with more than 1000 changes, I have to create an IP Ticket on the Eclipse side.
⇾ I will do this and link it to the PR.

Furthermore, thanks for adding the licence files for each picture … right now, there are many companies named. Is it just a copy & paste error? Or did they all contribute here? Or was this done by you?

@jSchuetz88 FYI

[LuisRickert]

@LuisRickert thanks for the PR. Can you please check the DEPENDENCIES file? It seems to be outdated. Since this is a PR with more than 1000 changes, I have to create an IP Ticket on the Eclipse side. ⇾ I will do this and link it to the PR.

Furthermore, thanks for adding the licence files for each picture … right now, there are many companies named. Is it just a copy & paste error? Or did they all contribute here? Or was this done by you?

@jSchuetz88 FYI

I'll check the dependency file. Still i'm confused that this check is failing since i did a rebase for this fixed PR so it is up to date (Yesterday evening) and we didn't do any changes to that file.

wrt. the license files, i just used the exsisting one, since i was. just the person who was tasked to create the PR.

[LuisRickert]

Hey @stephanbcbauer i did some investigation.

The "DEPENDENCIES" file is generated by the "3rd Party dependency"-Job based on the package-lock.json file. My reasoning:

• if the file in my PR is identical to the file the main branch, which it is, the result of the check should be the same
• this means the result of the check should be the same, ergo if it fails on my PR the check should also fail on the mail branch
• i did the check locally on my PR and it failed as expected
• the check also failed on the Main branch
• but if i run the check via the github actions on my fork the check fails for PR branch but not for the main branch
  -> this result confuses me

are the any guidance on this or have i missed something ?
dash-license tool is 1.1.1-Snapshot

[jSchuetz88]

Looks good to me. Is there an associated IP check ticket? If not, @stephanbcbauer could you please create one?

Beside the IP-check my only remark refers to the changelog (see comment below).

[jSchuetz88]

I'm confused here about the order? Why is version 1.2.0 newer than version 1.3.0?

[stephanbcbauer]

@jSchuetz88 IP issue created

[jSchuetz88]

@jSchuetz88 IP issue created

And already approved.

[stephanbcbauer]

PR Release relevant ⇾ minor issues will be resolved within a bugfix branch

• changelog wrong
• licence information for SVG need to be updated, source is missing

overall PR checked by @ther3sa , @jSchuetz88 , @stephanbcbauer

[stephanbcbauer]

LGTM, see last comment