optimism: uniswap pools dex balances

[Jason4276]

Thank you for contributing to Spellbook 🪄

Please open the PR in draft and mark as ready when you want to request a review.

Description:

[...]

---

quick links for more information:

• README.md
• spellbook docs
• CONTRIBUTING.md

[jeff-dude]

i'm second guessing myself a bit now, after seeing this moved here. since uniswap_v3_optimism schema is called out but no tables specifically, i think it already accounts for all tables under that schema automatically. i'm afraid if we add this table specifically, it could break other models that relied on the auto assignment of all tables under that schema.

last check, can you remove this table completely (i.e. lines 5 & 6), and just let it run with only the schema there? would like to see if CI is able to run fine in that setup.

also do help me confirm if you are sticking with this decoded table vs. switching to the other spell of pools mentioned.

[Jason4276]

Thank you for your guidance! I’ve decided to switch to using the uniswap_optimism_pools spell instead of the decoded table. This approach aligns better with the existing structure and ensures consistency across models.

I also ran CI without adding the table explicitly under sources, relying only on the schema, but an error occurred. Could you advise on what steps I should take next? Should I re-add the table explicitly, or is there another setup I should consider?

[jeff-dude]

i'm a bit confused. you mention moving to uniswap_optimism_pools spell as a source, but still see the old decoded table in the PR now?

you will need to list spell as a source here:
https://github.com/duneanalytics/spellbook/blob/main/sources/_subprojects_outputs/dex/_sources.yml

then update your model to read from source('uniswap_optimism,' 'pools')

[0xRobin]

please merge in main to resolve the compile issue.