Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Batch mode, autoanswer and rsync arguments #25

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vstefanoxx
Copy link
Collaborator

  • Prevent "Apply actions?" question on batch mode
  • Added options "a" and "aa" for conflict resolution, which act as following: in case of deletion on one side, and update on another side, choose sync of updated file instead of deletion of removed file; in case of updated file in both sides, privilege the most recent file; in other cases, give precedence to left side
  • Added command line option -r to specify additional rsync arguments (useful for adding --acls and --xattr options)
  • Added argument to command line option -b, with which is possible to specify the default action in case of conflict: 1, 2, a or e for exit

- Prevent "Apply actions?" question on batch mode
- Added options "a" and "aa" for conflict resolution, which act as following: in case of deletion on one side, and update on another side, choose sync of updated file instead of deletion of removed file; in case of updated file in both sides, privilege the most recent file; in other cases, give precedence to left side
- Added command line option -r to specify additional rsync arguments (useful for adding --acls and --xattr options)
- Added argument to command line option -b, with which is possible to specify the default action in case of conflict: 1, 2, a or e for exit
@dooblem
Copy link
Owner

dooblem commented Jun 14, 2016

Hello Stefano,

Sorry for the delay. Unfortunately I have few time those days to maintain and review issues/pull requests.

Are you interested in maintaining bsync? I may add you as a contributor to my repository, or add a message in my readme telling users to use your fork instead.

Whatever you prefer.

Thanks in advance,
Marc

@vstefanoxx
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hello Marc,

I really don't know. Me too don't have much time last period, but if you
add me as a contributor I will do my best to help maintaining bsync, at
least reviewing pull requests and possibly the issues. It will not be in
the really near future, but I can do it when I find a bit of time

Thank you,
Stefano

2016-06-14 19:40 GMT+02:00 Marc MAURICE [email protected]:

Hello Stefano,

Sorry for the delay. Unfortunately I have few time those days to maintain
and review issues/pull requests.

Are you interested in maintaining bsync? I may add you as a contributor to
my repository, or add a message in my readme telling users to use your fork
instead.

Whatever you prefer.

Thanks in advance,
Marc


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#25 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AEZt8CIc1CpjVXu64NYhDLyuMaxfS5Ekks5qLud5gaJpZM4H7eVu
.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants