-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 182
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(torii-grpc): add list to member value enum for usage in sdk #2828
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Ohayo! We need to implement the reverse conversion, sensei!
After reviewing the entire file, I can confirm that while we have the conversion from
MemberValue
to protobuf type, we're missing the reverse conversion (from protobuf toMemberValue
). This could lead to issues when deserializing data from the protobuf format.From<proto::types::MemberValue> for MemberValue
orTryFrom<proto::types::MemberValue> for MemberValue
List
variant needs to be handled recursively, similar to the forward conversion🔗 Analysis chain
Implementation looks clean, but let's verify the reverse conversion, sensei!
The conversion to protobuf type is well-implemented using iterators and handles nested values correctly. However, we should ensure the reverse conversion (from proto to MemberValue) is also implemented.
Let's check for the reverse conversion implementation:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
Length of output: 296
Script:
Length of output: 1963
Script:
Length of output: 16672