fix: ensure we check registered model and not declared models

[glihm]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Improved model registration logic for enhanced clarity and efficiency.
  • Streamlined handling of registration output to focus on actively registered models.

• Bug Fixes

  • Ensured only unregistered models are processed, reducing potential errors in registration.

• Refactor

  • Updated variable usage for better tracking of models needing registration.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Ohayo, sensei! The changes involve a significant update to the model registration logic in the migrate.rs file. A new variable, models_to_register, has been introduced to replace the old declared_models_tags, streamlining the process of tracking unregistered models. The output of the registration function has been modified to reflect this new logic, ensuring that only relevant models are processed and returned.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
crates/sozo/ops/src/migration/migrate.rs	Replaced declared_models_tags with models_to_register for tracking unregistered models; updated return statement to include models_to_register instead of registered_models.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Migration
    participant ModelRegistry

    User->>Migration: Initiate model registration
    Migration->>ModelRegistry: Check unregistered models
    ModelRegistry-->>Migration: Return unregistered models
    Migration->>ModelRegistry: Register models
    ModelRegistry-->>Migration: Return models_to_register
    Migration-->>User: Output registration results

Loading

---

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 40.00000% with 15 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 67.63%. Comparing base (fea03f4) to head (297a9b9).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
crates/sozo/ops/src/migration/migrate.rs	40.00%	15 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2368      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   67.63%   67.63%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         359      359              
  Lines       46977    46978       +1     
==========================================
  Hits        31775    31775              
- Misses      15202    15203       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.