-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 182
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bump account_sdk
to rev 199d87d
on main
#2165
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent changes to Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lock
is excluded by!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (1)
- Cargo.toml (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
Cargo.toml (2)
228-228
: Approved: Updatedaccount_sdk
to a specific revision.Switching from a branch-based to a revision-specific reference enhances stability and reproducibility.
229-229
: Approved: Updatedslot
to a consistent revision.Aligning the
slot
dependency with the same revision asaccount_sdk
ensures consistency across dependencies.
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ alloy-sol-types = { version = "0.7.6", default-features = false } | |||
criterion = "0.5.1" | |||
|
|||
# Controller integration | |||
account_sdk = { git = "https://github.com/cartridge-gg/controller", branch = "bump-starknet" } | |||
account_sdk = { git = "https://github.com/cartridge-gg/controller", rev = "199d87d" } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we want a tag for this more stable revision instead of a rev? Or not enough for a tag? (On the account sdk side)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not exactly sure for now but i think definitely should tag it
account_sdk
to rev 199d87d
on main'account_sdk
to rev 199d87d
on main
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2165 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 67.99% 67.99%
=======================================
Files 331 331
Lines 42686 42686
=======================================
Hits 29024 29024
Misses 13662 13662 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Summary by CodeRabbit
account_sdk
andslot
for more stable builds.