fix: add more logic on semver check of Starknet API

[glihm]

Description

Related issue

Tests

• Yes
• No, because they aren't needed
• No, because I need help

Added to documentation?

• README.md
• Dojo Book
• No documentation needed

Checklist

• I've formatted my code (scripts/prettier.sh, scripts/rust_fmt.sh, scripts/cairo_fmt.sh)
• I've linted my code (scripts/clippy.sh, scripts/docs.sh)
• I've commented my code
• I've requested a review after addressing the comments

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 91.89189% with 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 69.83%. Comparing base (de3b2e5) to head (17779db).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Files	Patch %	Lines
bin/sozo/src/commands/migrate.rs	91.89%	3 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1966      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   69.80%   69.83%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         313      313              
  Lines       35526    35562      +36     
==========================================
+ Hits        24798    24835      +37     
+ Misses      10728    10727       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[lambda-0x]

wdyt about using: https://docs.rs/semver/latest/semver/struct.VersionReq.html#method.matches instead of doing that logic manually?

[kariy]

wdyt about using: https://docs.rs/semver/latest/semver/struct.VersionReq.html#method.matches instead of doing that logic manually?

+1

[glihm]

wdyt about using: https://docs.rs/semver/latest/semver/struct.VersionReq.html#method.matches instead of doing that logic manually?

Just modified with the use of matches, very good comment on that. Thanks for it.

[lambda-0x]

apart from above comment LGTM!