-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 184
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Upgrade rust to 1.74.0 #1365
Upgrade rust to 1.74.0 #1365
Conversation
Hey @fishseabowl thanks for the contribution here! Would appreciate your input on the discussion started on the issue. 👍 Fixes #1407. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Don't forget to change it in the release ci as well
dojo/.github/workflows/release.yml
Line 11 in 3bb35a6
RUST_VERSION: 1.70.0 |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1365 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 67.41% 67.41%
=======================================
Files 218 218
Lines 20978 20978
=======================================
Hits 14142 14142
Misses 6836 6836 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Thanks for your reminder. Has changed. |
Hello @kariy, could you please take a look at the reported errors? It mentions that: = note: the |
Don't we need to publish an updated version of the dev container to match the toolchain version bump? Because for the build, toolchains are automatically downloaded if not present on the system. But components may be adjusted in this case. |
@kariy @tarrencev does something like this makes sense #1411? The idea is to be able to push some devcontainer updates without directly relying on the Never made devcontainer release, I'm perhaps missing something. WDYT? |
@glihm Yes, the dev container will automatically match the rust-toolchain version, as shown in the following code: Lines 19 to 22 in 3bb35a6
However, the ci/wasm and ci/clippy processes report errors related to uninstalled components, which seems strange.
|
Yup, in the meantime, @fishseabowl could you try with this image? |
yup that makes sense! |
@fishseabowl actually can you update with the new version of the dojo container? |
@glihm Yes. Done. Thank you for your help! |
@fishseabowl do appreciate you've started all the work on this bump and identified the root reason. The changes to the container triggered the auto PR that at the end is covering 100% of this PR. Apologize for that, I didn't had enough perspective to detect this earlier. I'll close this one for now, thanking you again for the time dedicated to this. |
This PR fixed the issue "Github Action for cargo-udeps failed" as mentioned in issue #1364