Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove all tags of CentOS (now fully EOL) #17094

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 2, 2024

Conversation

tianon
Copy link
Member

@tianon tianon commented Jul 1, 2024

@tianon tianon requested a review from a team as a code owner July 1, 2024 23:38
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 1, 2024

Diff for 19898b2:
diff --git a/_bashbrew-arches b/_bashbrew-arches
index 7822992..8b13789 100644
--- a/_bashbrew-arches
+++ b/_bashbrew-arches
@@ -1,5 +1 @@
-amd64
-arm32v7
-arm64v8
-i386
-ppc64le
+
diff --git a/_bashbrew-cat b/_bashbrew-cat
index 6a2321d..c534c5e 100644
--- a/_bashbrew-cat
+++ b/_bashbrew-cat
@@ -1,16 +1,3 @@
 Maintainers: The CentOS Project <[email protected]> (@CentOS)
 GitRepo: https://github.com/CentOS/sig-cloud-instance-images.git
 Directory: docker
-
-Tags: centos7, 7, centos7.9.2009, 7.9.2009
-Architectures: amd64, arm32v7, arm64v8, i386, ppc64le
-GitFetch: refs/heads/CentOS-7-x86_64
-GitCommit: b2d195220e1c5b181427c3172829c23ab9cd27eb
-arm32v7-GitCommit: 8022ae6d18ddf031b1b3a80549eeb46d1deb6dcd
-arm32v7-GitFetch: refs/heads/CentOS-7armhfp
-arm64v8-GitCommit: 02ea5808a8a155bad28677dd5857c8d382027e14
-arm64v8-GitFetch: refs/heads/CentOS-7-aarch64
-i386-GitCommit: 206003c215684a869a686cf9ea5f9697e577c546
-i386-GitFetch: refs/heads/CentOS-7-i386
-ppc64le-GitCommit: a8e4f3da8300d18da4c0e5256d64763965e66810
-ppc64le-GitFetch: refs/heads/CentOS-7-ppc64le
diff --git a/_bashbrew-list b/_bashbrew-list
index 27da3b6..e69de29 100644
--- a/_bashbrew-list
+++ b/_bashbrew-list
@@ -1,4 +0,0 @@
-centos:7
-centos:7.9.2009
-centos:centos7
-centos:centos7.9.2009
diff --git a/_bashbrew-list-build-order b/_bashbrew-list-build-order
index 6d4b269..e69de29 100644
--- a/_bashbrew-list-build-order
+++ b/_bashbrew-list-build-order
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-centos:7.9.2009
diff --git a/centos_7.9.2009/Dockerfile b/centos_7.9.2009/Dockerfile
deleted file mode 100644
index 0d1b5f1..0000000
diff --git a/centos_7.9.2009/centos-7-x86_64-docker.tar.xz b/centos_7.9.2009/centos-7-x86_64-docker.tar.xz
deleted file mode 100644
index 2dd7324..0000000
diff --git a/centos_7.9.2009/centos-7-x86_64-docker.tar.xz  'tar -t' b/centos_7.9.2009/centos-7-x86_64-docker.tar.xz  'tar -t'
deleted file mode 100644
index a77793c..0000000

Relevant Maintainers:

@tianon
Copy link
Member Author

tianon commented Jul 1, 2024

FYI affected maintainers for the CentOS EOL/removal:

Please either drop the affected tags from the supported list (by removing them from your library/ file) or update them to a supported release.

(Also, if you're not supposed to be in this list, or you're getting this forwarded to you and you are supposed to be in this list, please update the Maintainers: section of the relevant library/ file appropriately! 😅)

@tianon
Copy link
Member Author

tianon commented Jul 1, 2024

(See also #11679 and docker-library/docs#2205 -- namely, this image hasn't actually been maintained for a long time now, but the upstream distro is now explicitly EOL.)

@yosifkit yosifkit merged commit 8213b75 into docker-library:master Jul 2, 2024
6 checks passed
@yosifkit yosifkit deleted the centos-eol branch July 2, 2024 00:14
@tianon
Copy link
Member Author

tianon commented Jul 2, 2024

Hmm, looking at the deprecation notice, we should probably make some slight tweaks for the new "fully EOL" state.

@gdams
Copy link
Contributor

gdams commented Jul 4, 2024

FYI affected maintainers for the CentOS EOL/removal:

Please either drop the affected tags from the supported list (by removing them from your library/ file) or update them to a supported release.

(Also, if you're not supposed to be in this list, or you're getting this forwarded to you and you are supposed to be in this list, please update the Maintainers: section of the relevant library/ file appropriately! 😅)

Thanks for the heads up! I would refer back to my original ask here #12587. This would be very useful for maintainers to have better insights

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants