Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: small changes to MNIST benchmarks #240

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
Jan 2, 2025
Merged

Conversation

gumityolcu
Copy link
Collaborator

@gumityolcu gumityolcu commented Nov 25, 2024

Hello,

MNIST benchmarks are updated slightly. precommit config has been corrected. Tiny Imagenet benchmarks presented some difficulties so they will have their own PR.

one thing that should be fixed: For MixedDataset, adversarial datasets should have test train splits and the eval_dataset should only have the adversarial test split.

@gumityolcu gumityolcu changed the title Tiny imagenet benchmarks feat: Tiny imagenet benchmarks Nov 25, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.11%. Comparing base (e746691) to head (4a3af4a).
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #240   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.11%   92.11%           
=======================================
  Files          55       55           
  Lines        2345     2345           
=======================================
  Hits         2160     2160           
  Misses        185      185           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@gumityolcu gumityolcu changed the title feat: Tiny imagenet benchmarks fix: small changes to MNIST benchmarks Dec 6, 2024
@dilyabareeva dilyabareeva merged commit b04538a into main Jan 2, 2025
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants