Option to use speech-optimized tempo effect in from time_stretch() #89
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The SoX
tempo
effect has additional flags-s
and-m
which optimize WSOLA parameters for speech and music, respectively.In my testing, I found that using the
time_stretch()
without the-s
flag, there are significant artifacts in the audio, already at 0.7 or 1.3 factors, which are not too extreme, in my opinion. Simply adding the-s
flag makes the output much more smoother.As AudioTools is speech-oriented, I think it would be a sane default for many users to use this flag in
time_stretch()
.Sample below with original, before, after, code was:
0.5_0.7_stretch_samples.zip