Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

98355: Remove deprecated versions of DR sidekiq jobs #20165

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dfong-adh
Copy link
Contributor

@dfong-adh dfong-adh commented Jan 8, 2025

Summary

This removes deprecated DR sidekiq jobs as DR engine versions of the same jobs are already running in their place.

This will not be merged until Jan 13 or later.

  • This work is behind a feature toggle (flipper): YES/NO
    No

Related issue(s)

department-of-veterans-affairs/va.gov-team#98355

Testing done

Verified jobs were removed locally

What areas of the site does it impact?

Sidekiq jobs

Acceptance criteria

  • I fixed|updated|added unit tests and integration tests for each feature (if applicable).
  • No error nor warning in the console.
  • Events are being sent to the appropriate logging solution
  • Documentation has been updated (link to documentation)
  • No sensitive information (i.e. PII/credentials/internal URLs/etc.) is captured in logging, hardcoded, or specs
  • Feature/bug has a monitor built into Datadog (if applicable)
  • If app impacted requires authentication, did you login to a local build and verify all authenticated routes work as expected
  • I added a screenshot of the developed feature

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 8, 2025

1 Error
🚫 This PR changes 1767 LoC (not counting whitespace/newlines).

In order to ensure each PR receives the proper attention it deserves, those exceeding
500 will not be reviewed, nor will they be allowed to merge. Please break this PR up into
smaller ones.

If you have reason to believe that this PR should be granted an exception, please see the
Submitting pull requests for approval - FAQ.

File Summary

Files

  • app/sidekiq/decision_review/delete_saved_claim_records_job.rb (+0/-22)

  • app/sidekiq/decision_review/failure_notification_email_job.rb (+0/-183)

  • app/sidekiq/decision_review/hlr_status_updater_job.rb (+0/-34)

  • app/sidekiq/decision_review/nod_email_loader_job.rb (+0/-34)

  • app/sidekiq/decision_review/nod_send_email_job.rb (+0/-20)

  • app/sidekiq/decision_review/nod_status_updater_job.rb (+0/-37)

  • app/sidekiq/decision_review/saved_claim_status_updater_job.rb (+0/-189)

  • app/sidekiq/decision_review/sc_status_updater_job.rb (+0/-40)

  • spec/sidekiq/decision_review/delete_saved_claim_records_job_spec.rb (+0/-86)

  • spec/sidekiq/decision_review/failure_notification_email_job_spec.rb (+0/-516)

  • spec/sidekiq/decision_review/hlr_status_updater_job_spec.rb (+0/-24)

  • spec/sidekiq/decision_review/nod_email_loader_job_spec.rb (+0/-44)

  • spec/sidekiq/decision_review/nod_send_email_job_spec.rb (+0/-38)

  • spec/sidekiq/decision_review/nod_status_updater_job_spec.rb (+0/-25)

  • spec/sidekiq/decision_review/sc_status_updater_job_spec.rb (+0/-162)

  • spec/sidekiq/decision_review/shared_examples_for_status_updater_jobs.rb (+0/-313)

    Note: We exclude files matching the following when considering PR size:

    *.csv, *.json, *.tsv, *.txt, *.md, Gemfile.lock, app/swagger, modules/mobile/docs, spec/fixtures/, spec/support/vcr_cassettes/, modules/mobile/spec/support/vcr_cassettes/, db/seeds, modules/vaos/app/docs, modules/meb_api/app/docs, modules/appeals_api/app/swagger/, *.bru, *.pdf
    

Big PRs are difficult to review, often become stale, and cause delays.

Generated by 🚫 Danger

Copy link
Contributor

@shaunburdick shaunburdick left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@LindseySaari
Copy link
Contributor

@dfong-adh It looks like you may have forgotten to remove some of these jobs from the periodic job definitions

@shaunburdick
Copy link
Contributor

shaunburdick commented Jan 9, 2025

@dfong-adh It looks like you may have forgotten to remove some of these jobs from the periodic job definitions

@LindseySaari This PR is deleting the old code as these were moved to a module. Those refer to the new module versions of the cron (Yeah, it's confusing in a PR without context. Sorry)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants