-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 70
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
VACMS-15503 Add multi workflow filters to all Views that have exposed content moderation filter #15769
Conversation
Note to self: In our multiple workflow pr in #11334
|
@@ -10697,8 +10701,8 @@ | |||
"dev-2.x": "2.x-dev" | |||
}, | |||
"drupal": { | |||
"version": "8.x-2.0-beta1+4-dev", | |||
"datestamp": "1668804356", | |||
"version": "8.x-2.0-beta2+1-dev", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unrelated metadata changes.
selected_actions: | ||
- | ||
action_id: node_save_action | ||
preconfiguration: | ||
add_confirmation: 0 | ||
add_confirmation: false |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Most of these Views have not been changed in a long time so they are going to be full of this kind of noise. Sorry :(
editorial-draft: editorial-draft | ||
editorial-review: editorial-review | ||
editorial-published: editorial-published | ||
editorial-archived: editorial-archived |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should have never been limited. It was just outdated.
content_publisher: '0' | ||
content_admin: '0' | ||
redirect_administrator: '0' | ||
admnistrator_users: '0' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have more users than we had when this was last updated. These are expected.
editorial-draft: editorial-draft | ||
editorial-review: editorial-review | ||
editorial-published: editorial-published | ||
editorial-archived: editorial-archived |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Incorrectly limited in the old.
editorial-draft: editorial-draft | ||
editorial-review: editorial-review | ||
editorial-published: editorial-published | ||
editorial-archived: editorial-archived |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Incorrectly limited which was inadvertently hiding "pending appoval" status.
285547b
to
1dd5fe4
Compare
I just fixed the two issues @omahane identified. Is rebuilding now. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks great. It's working on all pages.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks good to me. Thank you for asking for a review, and sorry about the delay. I need some kind of automated queue to keep track of what I should be doing 🥵
Description
Relates to #15503
Testing done
Screenshots
QA steps
What needs to be checked to prove this works?
What needs to be checked to prove it didn't break any related things?
What variations of circumstances (users, actions, values) need to be checked?
As an admin go to the following Views and make sure the Moderation state filter is present and works.
Definition of Done
Select Team for PR review
CMS Team
Public websites
Facilities
User support
Accelerated Publishing
Is this PR blocked by another PR?
DO NOT MERGE
Does this PR need review from a Product Owner
Needs PO review
CMS user-facing announcement
Is an announcement needed to let editors know of this change?