-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 70
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SPIKE] Proposal for terms/fields in Service Taxonomy for RO MVP #11267
Comments
@davidmpickett is this a dupe of department-of-veterans-affairs/va.gov-team#58511? |
@jilladams No for a few reasons
|
@davidmpickett I failed to ask points, but am guessing 5? Update if I'm wrong. |
We will gain valuable insights into how users understand the taxonomy terms from the usability research. Until that is complete, there's no value in moving forward on this |
Blocked by usability research synthesis |
Unblocking / queuing for S95, since synthesis will wrap in S94. |
From planning: timeboxing to 5 for S95, 10/11 will articulate points / tasks for this sprint vs. future. |
@xiongjaneg @jilladams @mmiddaugh We brought this ticket in pretty light on detail. I just renamed it and added ACs. Take a quick look and lemme know if you have any concerns |
I just stubbed out a ticket for some new functionality we may want/need in the VA Service taxonomy to support the RO MVP. #15690 |
ACs look good to me - pls add estimate when any dust settles on AC feedback from others. |
Simplified list of VBA Services |
Pulled out the term names and proposed actions from this spreadsheet to make it easier to create tickets: Add to VA Service TaxonomyThese terms reflect the core offerings at regional offices and we have solid understandings of them. These could be a first batch of terms to add into Drupal and discuss with VBA / Taxonomy Council
Discuss with Facilities teamThese terms need some internal conversation/decisions before adding to the taxonomy. Dave/Alexis dig into usability research
Discuss with VBAThese terms may be out of scope for the MVP Pilot phase, or otherwise need some conversations and discussions that will be easier to have once we've gone through an initial batch.
Slack thread with add'l notes: https://dsva.slack.com/archives/C0FQSS30V/p1697490163440539 |
@davidmpickett Existing service: Veteran connections
Proposed service: State and local benefits
Proposed service: Veterans service organizations
Vet Center editors enter details about Veteran services organizations and local/state specific resources into their "Veteran connections" local descriptions. |
Great question. My understanding of "State and Local benefits" vs "Veterans service organizations" is coming from the public contact research where they were described as fundamentally two different types of service. State and Local benefits = Benefits/programs the public contact staff at the regional office routinely help Veterans understand/apply for. Here's a list of benefits in this category that were mentioned in the research.
Veterans service organizations = accredited representatives who help Veterans and beneficiaries apply for benefits and can advocate for them / give them advice in ways the staff in the Regional Office cannot. They often have offices in the same building as the regional office, but are not VA staff. Having a separate service where ROs could list out the contact information and clarify that Veterans/beneficiaries need to contact those organizations directly/separately. (Might also be a place to link to the VSO search tool) Veteran connections = Feels blobby. Sounds like it that might have been sufficient for Vet Centers, but I do not think it is a fit for what we know about VBA. All that being said, seems like there may be more conversation to have about these two and they drop out of the first bucket into one of the others. |
Thank you for that thorough explanation and context. The intended meaning/purpose for Veteran connections has felt nebulous to editors - at least in name. It is also categorized as a referral service - much like Veterans service organizations. This might be the opportunity to either evolve that particular service or to allow non-VBA editors to leverage new services. For what it is worth, just want to note that some of the services listed under the "Discuss with VBA" heading are already present in the service taxonomy while others would need to be added as new (and may have application for other editor types). |
Just stubbed a ticket for change management around Veteran connections for our future selves. This is part of a new epic I made to group all the tickets related to term changes |
New issue template for adding a term to taxonomy! https://github.com/department-of-veterans-affairs/va.gov-cms/blob/main/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/taxonomy-add-term.yml |
Description
Working document
Acceptance Criteria
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: