-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 176
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
merge #1662 to devel #1669
merge #1662 to devel #1669
Conversation
in previous version, if we use `template` in model deviation process, the generated LAMMPS input file would neglect fparam-dependence in DP model, as ``` pair_style deepmd ../graph.000.pb ../graph.001.pb ../graph.002.pb ../graph.003.pb out_freq 10 out_file model_devi.out pair_coeff * * ``` here we fixed this problem, as ``` pair_style deepmd ../graph.000.pb ../graph.001.pb ../graph.002.pb ../graph.003.pb out_freq 10 out_file model_devi.out fparam ${ELE_TEMP} pair_coeff * * ``` <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Enhanced the LAMMPS input model to support configurations based on electron temperature settings. - Added flexibility in handling different input scenarios with the introduction of a new parameter. - **Bug Fixes** - Improved compatibility checks for the specified DeepMD version in the input model construction. - **Documentation** - Updated comments for clarity regarding the new functionality and parameter usage. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## devel #1669 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 49.50% 49.53% +0.03%
==========================================
Files 83 83
Lines 14818 14853 +35
==========================================
+ Hits 7336 7358 +22
- Misses 7482 7495 +13 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚨 Try these New Features:
|
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
dpgen/generator/run.py (1)
1008-1010
: Add docstring for the new use_ele_temp parameter.The function signature has been updated but lacks documentation for the new parameter. Consider adding parameter description:
def revise_lmp_input_model( lmp_lines, task_model_list, trj_freq, deepmd_version="1", use_ele_temp=0 ): + """ + Parameters + ---------- + use_ele_temp : int, optional + Controls electron temperature handling: + 0: Disabled (default) + 1: Enable with fparam + 2: Enable with aparam + """
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
dpgen/generator/run.py
(6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
dpgen/generator/run.py
[warning] 1032-1032: dpgen/generator/run.py#L1032
Added line #L1032 was not covered by tests
🔇 Additional comments (2)
dpgen/generator/run.py (2)
1019-1033
: LGTM! Clean implementation of electron temperature support.
The conditional logic correctly handles the electron temperature parameter by adding fparam ${ELE_TEMP}
to the pair_style command when enabled. The implementation is clean and consistent with the requirements.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 1032-1032: dpgen/generator/run.py#L1032
Added line #L1032 was not covered by tests
Line range hint 1303-1440
: LGTM! Proper propagation of electron temperature parameter.
The electron temperature parameter is correctly propagated to the revise_lmp_input_model
function calls. The implementation maintains consistency across the codebase.
It looks that the CI is broken again... |
#1662 was wrongly merged into master.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
use_ele_temp
, for improved flexibility in input handling.Bug Fixes
use_ele_temp
value during model deviation tasks.