Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #217 and other misc updates #218

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
May 10, 2024
Merged

Fix #217 and other misc updates #218

merged 6 commits into from
May 10, 2024

Conversation

decentralgabe
Copy link
Member

Fix #217
thank you @KendallWeihe

@decentralgabe decentralgabe requested a review from finn-block as a code owner May 9, 2024 22:40
fairness in the retention and republishing of record sets by [[ref:Gateways]]. This mechanism, referred to as a
[[ref:Retention Proof]], requires clients to generate a proof value for write requests. This process guarantees that
the amount of work done by a client is proportional to the duration of data retention and republishing a [[ref:Gateway]]
fairness in the retention and [[ref:republishing]] of record sets by [[ref:Gateways]]. This mechanism, referred to as a
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

note much of this language will change in a follow-up PR for #74

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you may want to include the reasoning being to defend against spam, and specifically write (or create/update) spam, idk just an idea

Copy link
Member Author

@decentralgabe decentralgabe May 10, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this paragraph has a link to the section (#rate-limiting) which does this

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 9, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 51.62%. Comparing base (fa691e9) to head (92b87dd).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #218   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   51.62%   51.62%           
=======================================
  Files          32       32           
  Lines        2774     2774           
=======================================
  Hits         1432     1432           
  Misses       1199     1199           
  Partials      143      143           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ The DID DHT Method Specification 1.0
~ [Moe Jangda](https://github.com/mistermoe)
~ [Frank Hinek](https://github.com/frankhinek)
~ [Henry Tsai](https://github.com/thehenrytsai)
~ [Kendall Weihe](https://github.com/KendallWeihe)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hey that's me

spec/spec.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@KendallWeihe KendallWeihe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

one comment on the potentially accidentally deleted without? ✅

@decentralgabe decentralgabe merged commit ace9cfa into main May 10, 2024
10 checks passed
@decentralgabe decentralgabe deleted the fix-217 branch May 10, 2024 01:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug] Typo in example Resource Records table for svc value
3 participants