Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ADR 276: light sources #276
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
ADR 276: light sources #276
Changes from all commits
3893427
5e914b1
1cee77d
c408d59
9443ca5
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suggest removing the "Limitations and Considerations" section from this ADR. Here's why:
Let each explorer/renderer decide how to handle:
The SDK can provide:
These topics deserve their own documentation:
This approach:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I’m okay with removing the Limitations and Considerations section, but I’d like to challenge this approach slightly. These limitations guide how each client should behave, ensuring consistency across implementations. Without them, we risk significant divergence in how the feature works across clients, which might shift responsibility to creators to adapt to different behaviors.
Creating a separate ADR or RFC for these constraints could work, but we’d need to align on how the protocol should remain generic while still providing a baseline for consistent behavior. I also see the value in keeping this ADR abstract to allow for experimentation and flexibility, but it’s crucial we ensure creators aren’t left with unpredictable experiences due to discrepancies between clients.
Are we ok with having that differences between clients?
If we move this to another ADR, then we need to provide a clear guidelines, tools and documentation for creators to navigate that different clients.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with both, the ADR should focus on the protocol, but sometimes the protocol is more than just the data sent via the transport, it's also about the expected behavior.
I simplified these lines to something more generic: