-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 982
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update materialized view configuration for redshift #4589
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Thank you for these updates @mikealfare I'll get them published ASAP |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Things look good in the preview 👍
I didn't verify the code examples or the key technical details.
My main feedback is that:
- it would be nice to make the table less wide
- consider lowercase or sentence case for
NO
, and potentially others - maybe
boolean
instead ofbool
(or whatever our style is for this data type)
These are all nits, and I'm checking off the "Review by DX" box.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The preview looks awesome @mikealfare 👍
Gah, I missed the linked in the config block version. Let me fix that. |
What are you changing in this pull request and why?
I'm updating the configuration documentation for materialized views in
dbt-redshift
. We didn't initially support swapping materialized views with non-materialized views (e.g. table, view, etc.) in 1.6. We now support that for 1.7. While making these updates, I also implemented a structure that aligns with the structure I used fordbt-bigquery
. I will be submitting another PR for thedbt-postgres
changes that will align with this structure as well.Checklist