remove dbt/common req in favor of dbt-common dependency

[emmyoop]

resolves #9357

Problem

Pull out dbt/common and add dbt-common as a dependency. Legacy logger remains in the code for now.

Solution

Pull out dbt/common and add dbt-common as a dependency.

leave in legacy logger for now.

Checklist

• I have read the contributing guide and understand what's expected of me
• I have run this code in development and it appears to resolve the stated issue
• This PR includes tests, or tests are not required/relevant for this PR
• This PR has no interface changes (e.g. macros, cli, logs, json artifacts, config files, adapter interface, etc) or this PR has already received feedback and approval from Product or DX
• This PR includes type annotations for new and modified functions

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 39 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (a1f78a8) 86.67% compared to head (27a2840) 86.71%.

Files	Patch %	Lines
core/dbt/adapters/base/connections.py	28.57%	10 Missing ⚠️
core/dbt/contracts/graph/manifest.py	50.00%	7 Missing ⚠️
core/dbt/adapters/sql/connections.py	63.63%	4 Missing ⚠️
core/dbt/task/base.py	55.55%	4 Missing ⚠️
core/dbt/task/sql.py	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️
core/dbt/logger.py	40.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
core/dbt/adapters/base/relation.py	50.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
core/dbt/task/debug.py	83.33%	2 Missing ⚠️
core/dbt/contracts/sql.py	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
core/dbt/task/docs/generate.py	85.71%	1 Missing ⚠️
... and 1 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #9368      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   86.67%   86.71%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         230      185      -45     
  Lines       27060    24321    -2739     
==========================================
- Hits        23455    21089    -2366     
+ Misses       3605     3232     -373     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	84.03% <89.56%> (+0.39%)	⬆️
unit	63.71% <86.25%> (-1.55%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[MichelleArk]

I can't comment directly on the line but I also ran into the failing code quality check for in unparsed.py in #9342 and couldn't find a great workaround for it beyond just ignoring.