Use fastjsonschema instead of jsonschema for validation

[gshank]

resolves #10248

Problem

For performance reasons we would like to replace jsonschema validation with fastjsonschema validation.

Solution

The main changes are in dbt_common/dataclass_schema.py. This PR mainly handles changes to various error messages.

Checklist

• I have read the contributing guide and understand what's expected of me
• I have run this code in development and it appears to resolve the stated issue
• This PR includes tests, or tests are not required/relevant for this PR
• This PR has no interface changes (e.g. macros, cli, logs, json artifacts, config files, adapter interface, etc) or this PR has already received feedback and approval from Product or DX
• This PR includes type annotations for new and modified functions

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.11%. Comparing base (25c2042) to head (bd394ac).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #10249      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.88%   88.11%   -0.78%     
==========================================
  Files         180      180              
  Lines       22704    22720      +16     
==========================================
- Hits        20180    20019     -161     
- Misses       2524     2701     +177     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	84.62% <75.00%> (-1.58%)	⬇️
unit	62.31% <100.00%> (+0.07%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
Unit Tests	62.31% <100.00%> (+0.07%)	⬆️
Integration Tests	84.62% <75.00%> (-1.58%)	⬇️