Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
update
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
update
  • Loading branch information
claudiacalderon committed Dec 27, 2024
1 parent 13d3df5 commit ffbad4a
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 12 additions and 12 deletions.
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ partner = ["GitHub"]
dev_partner = ["World Bank"]
tags = ["Digital Development", "AI"]
links = ["https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.11046", "https://github.blog/news-insights/policy-news-and-insights/how-researchers-are-using-github-innovation-graph-data-to-estimate-the-impact-of-chatgpt/"]
date = 2024-12-31T00:00:00Z
date = 2024-12-27T00:00:00Z

+++

Expand All @@ -15,13 +15,13 @@ Advancements in Artificial Intelligence, especially with ChatGPT, have greatly i

## Challenge

The introduction of Large Language Models (LLMs) like OpenAI’s ChatGPT has brought significant changes to software development, revolutionizing tasks such as coding, debugging, and software design. However, the study of its impact on software productivity is still in its early stages due to the recent launch of the tool.
The introduction of Large Language Models (LLMs) like OpenAI’s ChatGPT has brought significant changes to software development, revolutionizing tasks such as coding, debugging, and software design. However, the study of its impact on software productivity is still in its early stages due to the recent launch of the tool.

The scarcity of research presents a key challenge, as limited prior work exists to build upon or guide new analyses. Furthermore, methodological complexities arise from ChatGPT’s non-randomized availability, requiring advanced techniques like Difference-in-Differences and Synthetic Control to isolate its effects from external confounding factors, such as economic trends or regional differences in technological adoption.
The scarcity of research presents a key challenge, as limited prior work exists to build upon or guide new analyses. Furthermore, methodological complexities arise from ChatGPT’s non-randomized availability, requiring advanced techniques like Difference-in-Differences and Synthetic Control to isolate its effects from external confounding factors, such as economic trends or regional differences in technological adoption.

Finally, the dynamic nature of AI tools compounds these challenges. The rapid development of newer versions, such as GPT-4, demands that researchers continuously adapt their methods to keep pace with evolving capabilities and changing contexts, ensuring findings remain relevant and actionable.




<figure align="centre">
<img src="impact-of-the-availability-of-chatgpt-on-software-development-activity_figure1.png"
<figcaption>
Expand All @@ -35,23 +35,23 @@ Estimated synthetic difference-in-differences (SDID) trends—average number of

## Solution

The team analyzed GitHub Innovation Graph data across multiple time periods to estimate the impact of ChatGPT access on software development at the country level. Since ChatGPT's availability was not randomized (e.g., it was not limited to a randomly selected group of countries), the study was designed as an observational study. To address the non-randomized nature of the data, the team employed the Synthetic Difference-in-Differences (SDID) method, enabling the construction of a robust counterfactual and isolating the effects of ChatGPT on software productivity metrics across countries.
The team analyzed GitHub Innovation Graph data across multiple time periods to estimate the impact of ChatGPT access on software development at the country level. Since ChatGPT's availability was not randomized (e.g., it was not limited to a randomly selected group of countries), the study was designed as an observational study. To address the non-randomized nature of the data, the team employed the Synthetic Difference-in-Differences (SDID) method, enabling the construction of a robust counterfactual and isolating the effects of ChatGPT on software productivity metrics across countries.

They analyzed the impact of ChatGPT on the velocity of software development, finding that the availability of ChatGPT:

They analyzed the impact of ChatGPT on the velocity of software development, finding that the availability of ChatGPT:
• Significantly increased the number of Git[^1] pushes by approximately 645.623 per 100,000 inhabitants.

• Significantly increased the number of Git[^1] pushes by approximately 645.623 per 100,000 inhabitants.

• Had a positive (although not statistically significant) correlation with the number of repositories and developers per 100,000 inhabitants.
• Had a positive (although not statistically significant) correlation with the number of repositories and developers per 100,000 inhabitants.

• Generally enhanced developer engagement across various programming languages. High-level languages like Python and JavaScript showed significant increases in unique developers, while the impact on domain-specific languages like HTML and SQL varied.



## Impact

After conducting this study, the World Bank team concluded that the future likely holds increased integration of AI tools like ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot in software development processes. Given the significant positive impact observed on the number of Git pushes, repositories, and unique developers, they predict that AI-driven development tools will become standard in software engineering.
After conducting this study, the World Bank team concluded that the future likely holds increased integration of AI tools like ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot in software development processes. Given the significant positive impact observed on the number of Git pushes, repositories, and unique developers, they predict that AI-driven development tools will become standard in software engineering.

Policymakers should consider the beneficial effects of AI tools like ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot on productivity and support their integration into various sectors. Deregulating access to such tools could promote economic growth, improve developer efficiency and speed up software production.
Policymakers should consider the beneficial effects of AI tools like ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot on productivity and support their integration into various sectors. Deregulating access to such tools could promote economic growth, improve developer efficiency and speed up software production.

Developers should embrace AI tools like ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot to boost their productivity and efficiency. By leveraging these tools for coding, debugging, and optimizing software, developers can concentrate on more complex and creative aspects of software engineering.

Expand Down

0 comments on commit ffbad4a

Please sign in to comment.